mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On consistent vertex nomination schemes

arXiv 1711.05610 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2017stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given a vertex of interest in a network G1, the vertex nomination problem seeks to find the corresponding vertex of interest (if it exists) in a second network G2. A vertex nomination scheme produces a list of the vertices in G2, ranked according to how likely they are judged to be the corresponding vertex of interest in G2. The vertex nomination problem and related information retrieval tasks have attracted much attention in the machine learning literature, with numerous applications to social and biological networks. However, the current framework has often been confined to a comparatively small class of network models, and the concept of statistically consistent vertex nomination schemes has been only shallowly explored. In this paper, we extend the vertex nomination problem to a very general statistical model of graphs. Further, drawing inspiration from the long-established classification framework in the pattern recognition literature, we provide definitions for the key notions of Bayes optimality and consistency in our extended vertex nomination framework, including a derivation of the Bayes optimal vertex nomination scheme. In addition, we prove that no universally consistent vertex nomination schemes exist. Illustrative examples are provided throughout.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

4 papers.