mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bayesian Deep Learning Hyperparameter Search for Robust Function Mapping to Polynomials with Noise

arXiv 2106.12532 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Advances in neural architecture search, as well as explainability and interpretability of connectionist architectures, have been reported in the recent literature. However, our understanding of how to design Bayesian Deep Learning (BDL) hyperparameters, specifically, the depth, width and ensemble size, for robust function mapping with uncertainty quantification, is still emerging. This paper attempts to further our understanding by mapping Bayesian connectionist representations to polynomials of different orders with varying noise types and ratios. We examine the noise-contaminated polynomials to search for the combination of hyperparameters that can extract the underlying polynomial signals while quantifying uncertainties based on the noise attributes. Specifically, we attempt to study the question that an appropriate neural architecture and ensemble configuration can be found to detect a signal of any n-th order polynomial contaminated with noise having different distributions and signal-to-noise (SNR) ratios and varying noise attributes. Our results suggest the possible existence of an optimal network depth as well as an optimal number of ensembles for prediction skills and uncertainty quantification, respectively. However, optimality is not discernible for width, even though the performance gain reduces with increasing width at high values of width. Our experiments and insights can be directional to understand theoretical properties of BDL representations and to design practical solutions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2021.

Builds on

25 of 57 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  3. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  4. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 541
  5. 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 320
  6. 2017Concrete Dropoutcited by 227
  7. 2015The Power of Depth for Feedforward Neural Networkscited by 183
  8. 2016Why and When Can Deep -- but Not Shallow -- Networks Avoid the Curse of Dimensionality: a Reviewcited by 155
  9. 2018Fast and Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning by Weight-Perturbation in Adamcited by 131
  10. 2019A General Framework for Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learningcited by 119
  11. 2015On the Expressive Power of Deep Learning: A Tensor Analysiscited by 97
  12. 2019Subspace Inference for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 95
13 more
  1. 2016Why Deep Neural Networks for Function Approximation?cited by 82
  2. 2016Depth-Width Tradeoffs in Approximating Natural Functions with Neural Networkscited by 59
  3. 2020Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Scientific Discovery: An Application in Simulating Lake Temperature Profilescited by 59
  4. 2016Towards Bayesian Deep Learning: A Framework and Some Existing Methodscited by 58
  5. 2020The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Learning in Artificial Intelligencecited by 57
  6. 2018Physics Guided RNNs for Modeling Dynamical Systems: A Case Study in Simulating Lake Temperature Profilescited by 55
  7. 2019Is Deeper Better only when Shallow is Good?cited by 24
  8. 2017Tensor Contraction Layers for Parsimonious Deep Netscited by 16
  9. 2018Quantifying Uncertainty in Discrete-Continuous and Skewed Data with Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 13
  10. 2018Geometry of energy landscapes and the optimizability of deep neural networkscited by 9
  11. 2019Bayesian deep learning with hierarchical prior: Predictions from limited and noisy datacited by 8
  12. 2017Exploring the Function Space of Deep-Learning Machinescited by 7
  13. 2019The Deeper, the Better: Analysis of Person Attributes Recognitioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.