mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PALRACE: Reading Comprehension Dataset with Human Data and Labeled Rationales

arXiv 2106.12373 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pre-trained language models achieves high performance on machine reading comprehension (MRC) tasks but the results are hard to explain. An appealing approach to make models explainable is to provide rationales for its decision. To investigate whether human rationales can further improve current models and to facilitate supervised learning of human rationales, here we present PALRACE (Pruned And Labeled RACE), a new MRC dataset with human labeled rationales for 800 passages selected from the RACE dataset. We further classified the question to each passage into 6 types. Each passage was read by at least 26 human readers, who labeled their rationales to answer the question. It is demonstrated that models such as RoBERTa-large outperforms human readers in all 6 types of questions, including inference questions, but its performance can be further improved when having access to the human rationales. Simpler models and pre-trained models that are not fine-tuned based on the task benefit more from human rationales, and their performance can be boosted by more than 30% by rationales. With access to human rationales, a simple model based on the GloVe word embedding can reach the performance of BERT-base.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2021.

Builds on

11 of 14 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  2. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  3. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  4. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  5. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  6. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
  7. 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
  8. 2016Rationale-Augmented Convolutional Neural Networks for Text Classificationcited by 39
  9. 2019What does BERT Learn from Multiple-Choice Reading Comprehension Datasets?cited by 30
  10. 2020Benchmarking Robustness of Machine Reading Comprehension Modelscited by 18
  11. 2020STARC: Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehensioncited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.