Privacy Amplification via Iteration for Shuffled and Online PNSGD
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we consider the framework of privacy amplification via iteration, which is originally proposed by Feldman et al. and subsequently simplified by Asoodeh et al. in their analysis via the contraction coefficient. This line of work focuses on the study of the privacy guarantees obtained by the projected noisy stochastic gradient descent (PNSGD) algorithm with hidden intermediate updates. A limitation in the existing literature is that only the early stopped PNSGD has been studied, while no result has been proved on the more widely-used PNSGD applied on a shuffled dataset. Moreover, no scheme has been yet proposed regarding how to decrease the injected noise when new data are received in an online fashion. In this work, we first prove a privacy guarantee for shuffled PNSGD, which is investigated asymptotically when the noise is fixed for each sample size n but reduced at a predetermined rate when n increases, in order to achieve the convergence of privacy loss. We then analyze the online setting and provide a faster decaying scheme for the magnitude of the injected noise that also guarantees the convergence of privacy loss.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2021.
Builds on
12 of 21 references.
References · 12
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 237
- 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 234
- 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 163
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacycited by 139
- 2019Deep Learning with Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 112
- 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 97
- 2019Privacy Amplification by Mixing and Diffusion Mechanismscited by 21
- 2020Privacy Amplification of Iterative Algorithms via Contraction Coefficientscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Faster high-accuracy log-concave sampling via algorithmic warm startscited by 44
- 2022Resolving the Mixing Time of the Langevin Algorithm to its Stationary Distribution for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 21
- 2023Privacy Loss of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent Might Converge Even for Non-Convex Lossescited by 10
- 2024Convex Approximation of Two-Layer ReLU Networks for Hidden State Differential Privacycited by 2
- 2024Convex Approximation of Two-Layer ReLU Networks for Hidden State Differential Privacy5 Jul 2024
- 2023Privacy Loss of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent Might Converge Even for Non-Convex Losses17 May 2023
- 2023Faster high-accuracy log-concave sampling via algorithmic warm starts20 Feb 2023
- 2022Resolving the Mixing Time of the Langevin Algorithm to its Stationary Distribution for Log-Concave Sampling16 Oct 2022