mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fully automated quantification of in vivo viscoelasticity of prostate zones using magnetic resonance elastography with Dense U-net segmentation

arXiv 2106.11284 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2021eess.IV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for measuring viscoelasticity heavily depends on proper tissue segmentation, especially in heterogeneous organs such as the prostate. Using trained network-based image segmentation, we investigated if MRE data suffice to extract anatomical and viscoelastic information for automatic tabulation of zonal mechanical properties of the prostate. Overall, 40 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or prostate cancer (PCa) were examined with three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences: T2-weighted MRI (T2w), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and MRE-based tomoelastography yielding six independent sets of imaging data per patient (T2w, DWI, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), MRE magnitude, shear wave speed, and loss angle maps). Combinations of these data were used to train Dense U-nets with manually segmented masks of the entire prostate gland (PG), central zone (CZ), and peripheral zone (PZ) in 30 patients and to validate them in 10 patients. Dice score (DS), sensitivity, specificity, and Hausdorff distance were determined. We found that segmentation based on MRE magnitude maps alone (DS, PG: 0.93±0.04, CZ: 0.95±0.03, PZ: 0.77±0.05) was more accurate than magnitude maps combined with T2w and DWIb (DS, PG: 0.91±0.04, CZ: 0.91±0.06, PZ: 0.63±0.16) or T2w alone (DS, PG: 0.92±0.03, CZ: 0.91±0.04, PZ: 0.65±0.08). Automatically tabulated MRE values were not different from ground-truth values (P>0.05). In conclusion: MRE combined with Dense U-net segmentation allows tabulation of quantitative imaging markers without manual analysis and independent of other MRI sequences and can thus contribute to PCa detection and classification.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2021.

Builds on

6 of 55 references.

References · 6

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  3. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  4. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
  5. 2016The Importance of Skip Connections in Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 126
  6. 2017Deeply-Supervised CNN for Prostate Segmentationcited by 30

Built on by

Not cited yet.