Data Optimisation for a Deep Learning Recommender System
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper advocates privacy preserving requirements on collection of user data for recommender systems. The purpose of our study is twofold. First, we ask if restrictions on data collection will hurt test quality of RNN-based recommendations. We study how validation performance depends on the available amount of training data. We use a combination of top-K accuracy, catalog coverage and novelty for this purpose, since good recommendations for the user is not necessarily captured by a traditional accuracy metric. Second, we ask if we can improve the quality under minimal data by using secondary data sources. We propose knowledge transfer for this purpose and construct a representation to measure similarities between purchase behaviour in data. This to make qualified judgements of which source domain will contribute the most. Our results show that (i) there is a saturation in test performance when training size is increased above a critical point. We also discuss the interplay between different performance metrics, and properties of data. Moreover, we demonstrate that (ii) our representation is meaningful for measuring purchase behaviour. In particular, results show that we can leverage secondary data to improve validation performance if we select a relevant source domain according to our similarly measure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2021.
Builds on
13 of 39 references.
References · 13
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
- 2017Recurrent Neural Networks with Top-k Gains for Session-based Recommendationscited by 165
- 2016Improved Recurrent Neural Networks for Session-based Recommendationscited by 86
- 2017Personalizing Session-based Recommendations with Hierarchical Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 84
- 2018Privacy Preserving Machine Learning: Threats and Solutionscited by 78
- 2014Grammar as a Foreign Languagecited by 70
1 more
- 2013Differential Data Analysis for Recommender Systemscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.