mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semi-supervised Active Regression

arXiv 2106.06676 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2021cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Labelled data often comes at a high cost as it may require recruiting human labelers or running costly experiments. At the same time, in many practical scenarios, one already has access to a partially labelled, potentially biased dataset that can help with the learning task at hand. Motivated by such settings, we formally initiate a study of semi-supervised active learning through the frame of linear regression. In this setting, the learner has access to a dataset X ∈ ℝ(n1+n2) × d which is composed of n1 unlabelled examples that an algorithm can actively query, and n2 examples labelled a-priori. Concretely, denoting the true labels by Y ∈ ℝn1 + n2, the learner's objective is to find widehatβ ∈ ℝd such that, beginequation | X widehatβ - Y |22 ≤ (1 + ε) minβ ∈ ℝd | X β - Y |22 endequation while making as few additional label queries as possible. In order to bound the label queries, we introduce an instance dependent parameter called the reduced rank, denoted by RX, and propose an efficient algorithm with query complexity O(RX/ε). This result directly implies improved upper bounds for two important special cases: (i) active ridge regression, and (ii) active kernel ridge regression, where the reduced-rank equates to the statistical dimension, sdλ and effective dimension, dλ of the problem respectively, where λ ≥ 0 denotes the regularization parameter. For active ridge regression we also prove a matching lower bound of O(sdλ / ε) on the query complexity of any algorithm. This subsumes prior work that only considered the unregularized case, i.e., λ = 0.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2021.

Builds on

17 of 43 references.

References · 17

  1. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  2. 2014Sketching as a Tool for Numerical Linear Algebracited by 285
  3. 2019Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasetscited by 173
  4. 2019Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overviewcited by 137
  5. 2019Consistency-based Semi-supervised Active Learning: Towards Minimizing Labeling Costcited by 114
  6. 2018On Coresets for Logistic Regressioncited by 65
  7. 2017Active Regression via Linear-Sample Sparsificationcited by 36
  8. 2020Fairness in Semi-supervised Learning: Unlabeled Data Help to Reduce Discriminationcited by 22
  9. 2014Fast Randomized Kernel Methods With Statistical Guaranteescited by 21
  10. 2016Sharper Bounds for Regularized Data Fittingcited by 19
  11. 2015Constructing Linear-Sized Spectral Sparsification in Almost-Linear Timecited by 17
  12. 2019Active and Semi-Supervised Learning in ASR: Benefits on the Acoustic and Language Modelscited by 16
5 more
  1. 2018Leveraged volume sampling for linear regressioncited by 15
  2. 2017Unbiased estimates for linear regression via volume samplingcited by 13
  3. 2015Introducing Geometry in Active Learning for Image Segmentationcited by 12
  4. 2019Tight Kernel Query Complexity of Kernel Ridge Regression and Kernel k-means Clusteringcited by 2
  5. 2020Streaming Complexity of SVMscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.