Tight Kernel Query Complexity of Kernel Ridge Regression and Kernel k-means Clustering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present tight lower bounds on the number of kernel evaluations required to approximately solve kernel ridge regression (KRR) and kernel k-means clustering (KKMC) on n input points. For KRR, our bound for relative error approximation to the minimizer of the objective function is Omega(ndeffλ/varepsilon) where deffλ is the effective statistical dimension, which is tight up to a log(deffλ/varepsilon) factor. For KKMC, our bound for finding a k-clustering achieving a relative error approximation of the objective function is Omega(nk/varepsilon), which is tight up to a log(k/varepsilon) factor. Our KRR result resolves a variant of an open question of El Alaoui and Mahoney, asking whether the effective statistical dimension is a lower bound on the sampling complexity or not. Furthermore, for the important practical case when the input is a mixture of Gaussians, we provide a KKMC algorithm which bypasses the above lower bound.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 May 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.
2 papers.
- 2023Sketching Algorithms for Sparse Dictionary Learning: PTAS and Turnstile Streaming29 Oct 2023
- 2021Semi-supervised Active Regression12 Jun 2021