mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Predicting Deep Neural Network Generalization with Perturbation Response Curves

arXiv 2106.04765 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The field of Deep Learning is rich with empirical evidence of human-like performance on a variety of prediction tasks. However, despite these successes, the recent Predicting Generalization in Deep Learning (PGDL) NeurIPS 2020 competition suggests that there is a need for more robust and efficient measures of network generalization. In this work, we propose a new framework for evaluating the generalization capabilities of trained networks. We use perturbation response (PR) curves that capture the accuracy change of a given network as a function of varying levels of training sample perturbation. From these PR curves, we derive novel statistics that capture generalization capability. Specifically, we introduce two new measures for accurately predicting generalization gaps: the Gi-score and Pal-score, which are inspired by the Gini coefficient and Palma ratio (measures of income inequality), that accurately predict generalization gaps. Using our framework applied to intra and inter-class sample mixup, we attain better predictive scores than the current state-of-the-art measures on a majority of tasks in the PGDL competition. In addition, we show that our framework and the proposed statistics can be used to capture to what extent a trained network is invariant to a given parametric input transformation, such as rotation or translation. Therefore, these generalization gap prediction statistics also provide a useful means for selecting optimal network architectures and hyperparameters that are invariant to a certain perturbation.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2021.

Builds on

17 of 39 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  5. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  6. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,131
  7. 2013Network In Networkcited by 600
  8. 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
  9. 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
  10. 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
  11. 2018Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations?cited by 198
  12. 2018Predicting the Generalization Gap in Deep Networks with Margin Distributionscited by 111
5 more
  1. 2020Learning Invariances in Neural Networkscited by 52
  2. 2020NeurIPS 2020 Competition: Predicting Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 41
  3. 2020Representation Based Complexity Measures for Predicting Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 29
  4. 2021Robustness to Augmentations as a Generalization metriccited by 13
  5. 2020Generalization Comparison of Deep Neural Networks via Output Sensitivitycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

14 papers.

Sort: