mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When in Doubt: Neural Non-Parametric Uncertainty Quantification for Epidemic Forecasting

arXiv 2106.03904 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate and trustworthy epidemic forecasting is an important problem that has impact on public health planning and disease mitigation. Most existing epidemic forecasting models disregard uncertainty quantification, resulting in mis-calibrated predictions. Recent works in deep neural models for uncertainty-aware time-series forecasting also have several limitations; e.g. it is difficult to specify meaningful priors in Bayesian NNs, while methods like deep ensembling are computationally expensive in practice. In this paper, we fill this important gap. We model the forecasting task as a probabilistic generative process and propose a functional neural process model called EPIFNP, which directly models the probability density of the forecast value. EPIFNP leverages a dynamic stochastic correlation graph to model the correlations between sequences in a non-parametric way, and designs different stochastic latent variables to capture functional uncertainty from different perspectives. Our extensive experiments in a real-time flu forecasting setting show that EPIFNP significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art models in both accuracy and calibration metrics, up to 2.5x in accuracy and 2.4x in calibration. Additionally, due to properties of its generative process,EPIFNP learns the relations between the current season and similar patterns of historical seasons,enabling interpretable forecasts. Beyond epidemic forecasting, the EPIFNP can be of independent interest for advancing principled uncertainty quantification in deep sequential models for predictive analytics

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2021.

Builds on

21 of 42 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  4. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  5. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  6. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  7. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
  8. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
  9. 2018Neural Processescited by 311
  10. 2019Attentive Neural Processescited by 283
  11. 2019Cyclical Stochastic Gradient MCMC for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 203
  12. 2017Multiplicative Normalizing Flows for Variational Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 157
9 more
  1. 2015Preconditioned Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics for Deep Neural Networkscited by 121
  2. 2019Distribution Calibration for Regressioncited by 89
  3. 2020SDE-Net: Equipping Deep Neural Networks with Uncertainty Estimatescited by 75
  4. 2019The Functional Neural Processcited by 43
  5. 2017Bayesian Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 39
  6. 2019Recurrent Attentive Neural Process for Sequential Datacited by 15
  7. 2020When and How to Lift the Lockdown? Global COVID-19 Scenario Analysis and Policy Assessment using Compartmental Gaussian Processescited by 14
  8. 2020Steering a Historical Disease Forecasting Model Under a Pandemic: Case of Flu and COVID-19cited by 12
  9. 2017A Framework for Evaluating Epidemic Forecastscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 5; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

16 papers.

Sort: