mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Embracing Ambiguity: Shifting the Training Target of NLI Models

arXiv 2106.03020 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2021cs.CLcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Natural Language Inference (NLI) datasets contain examples with highly ambiguous labels. While many research works do not pay much attention to this fact, several recent efforts have been made to acknowledge and embrace the existence of ambiguity, such as UNLI and ChaosNLI. In this paper, we explore the option of training directly on the estimated label distribution of the annotators in the NLI task, using a learning loss based on this ambiguity distribution instead of the gold-labels. We prepare AmbiNLI, a trial dataset obtained from readily available sources, and show it is possible to reduce ChaosNLI divergence scores when finetuning on this data, a promising first step towards learning how to capture linguistic ambiguity. Additionally, we show that training on the same amount of data but targeting the ambiguity distribution instead of gold-labels can result in models that achieve higher performance and learn better representations for downstream tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2021.

Builds on

8 of 11 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  3. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  4. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  5. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
  6. 2019Abductive Commonsense Reasoningcited by 300
  7. 2020What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?cited by 148
  8. 2019Uncertain Natural Language Inferencecited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 9; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Modelscited by 253
  2. 2023We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguitycited by 124
  3. 2022Stop Measuring Calibration When Humans Disagreecited by 70
  4. 2023You Are What You Annotate: Towards Better Models through Annotator Representationscited by 40
  5. 2023Can Large Language Models Capture Dissenting Human Voices?cited by 33
  6. 2022SimANS: Simple Ambiguous Negatives Sampling for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 21
  7. 2022Symptom Identification for Interpretable Detection of Multiple Mental Disorderscited by 20
  8. 2024Interpreting Predictive Probabilities: Model Confidence or Human Label Variation?cited by 15
  9. 2025Always Tell Me The Odds: Fine-grained Conditional Probability Estimationcited by 9
  10. 2023No Strong Feelings One Way or Another: Re-operationalizing Neutrality in Natural Language Inferencecited by 4
  11. 2025LOGicalThought: Logic-Based Ontological Grounding of LLMs for High-Assurance Reasoningcited by 4
  12. 2022Possible Stories: Evaluating Situated Commonsense Reasoning under Multiple Possible Scenarioscited by 3
10 more
  1. 2023Unveiling the Multi-Annotation Process: Examining the Influence of Annotation Quantity and Instance Difficulty on Model Performancecited by 3
  2. 2025Giving AI Personalities Leads to More Human-Like Reasoningcited by 3
  3. 2025From Disagreement to Understanding: The Case for Ambiguity Detection in NLIcited by 3
  4. 2023On Degrees of Freedom in Defining and Testing Natural Language Understandingcited by 1
  5. 2023Deep Model Compression Also Helps Models Capture Ambiguitycited by 1
  6. 2024Self-Knowledge Distillation for Learning Ambiguitycited by 1
  7. 2022An Understanding-Oriented Robust Machine Reading Comprehension Modelcited by 0
  8. 2023Quantifying Divergence for Human-AI Collaboration and Cognitive Trustcited by 0
  9. 2026Annotation Entropy Predicts Per-Example Learning Dynamics in LoRA Fine-Tuningcited by 0
  10. 2026SHALA-LLM: Smartly Handling Ambiguous Labels in Aligning LLMscited by 0