Visual Search Asymmetry: Deep Nets and Humans Share Similar Inherent Biases
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual search is a ubiquitous and often challenging daily task, exemplified by looking for the car keys at home or a friend in a crowd. An intriguing property of some classical search tasks is an asymmetry such that finding a target A among distractors B can be easier than finding B among A. To elucidate the mechanisms responsible for asymmetry in visual search, we propose a computational model that takes a target and a search image as inputs and produces a sequence of eye movements until the target is found. The model integrates eccentricity-dependent visual recognition with target-dependent top-down cues. We compared the model against human behavior in six paradigmatic search tasks that show asymmetry in humans. Without prior exposure to the stimuli or task-specific training, the model provides a plausible mechanism for search asymmetry. We hypothesized that the polarity of search asymmetry arises from experience with the natural environment. We tested this hypothesis by training the model on augmented versions of ImageNet where the biases of natural images were either removed or reversed. The polarity of search asymmetry disappeared or was altered depending on the training protocol. This study highlights how classical perceptual properties can emerge in neural network models, without the need for task-specific training, but rather as a consequence of the statistical properties of the developmental diet fed to the model. All source code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/kreimanlab/VisualSearchAsymmetry.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2021.
Builds on
10 of 72 references.
References · 10
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 664
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
- 2018Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Studycited by 83
- 2017Cognitive Psychology for Deep Neural Networks: A Shape Bias Case Studycited by 46
- 2018Finding any Waldo: zero-shot invariant and efficient visual searchcited by 28
- 2014A normalization model of visual search predicts single trial human fixations in an object search taskcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2023Training-free Object Counting with Promptscited by 34
- 2024OmniCount: Multi-label Object Counting with Semantic-Geometric Priorscited by 16
- 2024LF-ViT: Reducing Spatial Redundancy in Vision Transformer for Efficient Image Recognitioncited by 13
- 2025Peering into the Unknown: Active View Selection with Neural Uncertainty Maps for 3D Reconstructioncited by 5
- 2022Improving generalization by mimicking the human visual dietcited by 2
- 2022Learning to See the Elephant in the Room: Self-Supervised Context Reasoning in Humans and AIcited by 2
- 2024Gazing at Rewards: Eye Movements as a Lens into Human and AI Decision-Making in Hybrid Visual Foragingcited by 2
- 2024L-WISE: Boosting Human Visual Category Learning Through Model-Based Image Selection and Enhancementcited by 2
- 2022Can Machines Imitate Humans? Integrative Turing-like tests for Language and Vision Demonstrate a Narrowing Gapcited by 0
- 2024Pop-out vs. Glue: A Study on the pre-attentive and focused attention stages in Visual Search taskscited by 0
- 2026Directional Confusions Reveal Divergent Inductive Biases Through Rate-Distortion Geometry in Human and Machine Visioncited by 0
- 2026Matched Outcomes, Divergent Gaze: How Foveated MLLMs Search Compared to Humanscited by 0
- 2026Matched Outcomes, Divergent Gaze: How Foveated MLLMs Search Compared to Humans17 Aug 2026
- 2026Directional Confusions Reveal Divergent Inductive Biases Through Rate-Distortion Geometry in Human and Machine Vision23 Apr 2026
- 2025Peering into the Unknown: Active View Selection with Neural Uncertainty Maps for 3D Reconstruction17 Jun 2025
- 2024Pop-out vs. Glue: A Study on the pre-attentive and focused attention stages in Visual Search tasks14 Dec 2024
- 2024L-WISE: Boosting Human Visual Category Learning Through Model-Based Image Selection and Enhancement12 Dec 2024
- 2024Gazing at Rewards: Eye Movements as a Lens into Human and AI Decision-Making in Hybrid Visual Foraging14 Nov 2024
- 2024OmniCount: Multi-label Object Counting with Semantic-Geometric Priors8 Mar 2024
- 2024LF-ViT: Reducing Spatial Redundancy in Vision Transformer for Efficient Image Recognition8 Jan 2024
- 2023Training-free Object Counting with Prompts30 Jun 2023
- 2022Can Machines Imitate Humans? Integrative Turing-like tests for Language and Vision Demonstrate a Narrowing Gap23 Nov 2022
- 2022Learning to See the Elephant in the Room: Self-Supervised Context Reasoning in Humans and AI23 Nov 2022
- 2022Improving generalization by mimicking the human visual diet15 Jun 2022