mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Solving hybrid machine learning tasks by traversing weight space geodesics

arXiv 2106.02793 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning problems have an intrinsic geometric structure as central objects including a neural network's weight space and the loss function associated with a particular task can be viewed as encoding the intrinsic geometry of a given machine learning problem. Therefore, geometric concepts can be applied to analyze and understand theoretical properties of machine learning strategies as well as to develop new algorithms. In this paper, we address three seemingly unrelated open questions in machine learning by viewing them through a unified framework grounded in differential geometry. Specifically, we view the weight space of a neural network as a manifold endowed with a Riemannian metric that encodes performance on specific tasks. By defining a metric, we can construct geodesic, minimum length, paths in weight space that represent sets of networks of equivalent or near equivalent functional performance on a specific task. We, then, traverse geodesic paths while identifying networks that satisfy a second objective. Inspired by the geometric insight, we apply our geodesic framework to 3 major applications: (i) Network sparsification (ii) Mitigating catastrophic forgetting by constructing networks with high performance on a series of objectives and (iii) Finding high-accuracy paths connecting distinct local optima of deep networks in the non-convex loss landscape. Our results are obtained on a wide range of network architectures (MLP, VGG11/16) trained on MNIST, CIFAR-10/100. Broadly, we introduce a geometric framework that unifies a range of machine learning objectives and that can be applied to multiple classes of neural network architectures.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2021.

Builds on

18 of 41 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  3. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  4. 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 711
  5. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
  6. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 578
  7. 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 286
  8. 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 278
  9. 2014Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problemscited by 186
  10. 2015A Simple Way to Initialize Recurrent Networks of Rectified Linear Unitscited by 130
  11. 2015Path-SGD: Path-Normalized Optimization in Deep Neural Networkscited by 117
  12. 2018Measuring and regularizing networks in function spacecited by 97
6 more
  1. 2020On the distance between two neural networks and the stability of learningcited by 46
  2. 2017The High-Dimensional Geometry of Binary Neural Networkscited by 22
  3. 2016NoiseOut: A Simple Way to Prune Neural Networkscited by 9
  4. 2017Automated Pruning for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 6
  5. 2018Training Behavior of Sparse Neural Network Topologiescited by 6
  6. 2019On Geometric Structure of Activation Spaces in Neural Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.