mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NMS-Loss: Learning with Non-Maximum Suppression for Crowded Pedestrian Detection

arXiv 2106.02426 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2021cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) is essential for object detection and affects the evaluation results by incorporating False Positives (FP) and False Negatives (FN), especially in crowd occlusion scenes. In this paper, we raise the problem of weak connection between the training targets and the evaluation metrics caused by NMS and propose a novel NMS-Loss making the NMS procedure can be trained end-to-end without any additional network parameters. Our NMS-Loss punishes two cases when FP is not suppressed and FN is wrongly eliminated by NMS. Specifically, we propose a pull loss to pull predictions with the same target close to each other, and a push loss to push predictions with different targets away from each other. Experimental results show that with the help of NMS-Loss, our detector, namely NMS-Ped, achieves impressive results with Miss Rate of 5.92% on Caltech dataset and 10.08% on CityPersons dataset, which are both better than state-of-the-art competitors.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2021.

Builds on

22 of 37 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  4. 2017Soft-NMS -- Improving Object Detection With One Line of Codecited by 380
  5. 2017CityPersons: A Diverse Dataset for Pedestrian Detectioncited by 171
  6. 2016A Unified Multi-scale Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Fast Object Detectioncited by 83
  7. 2019Adaptive NMS: Refining Pedestrian Detection in a Crowdcited by 66
  8. 2020Detection in Crowded Scenes: One Proposal, Multiple Predictionscited by 59
  9. 2018Occlusion-aware R-CNN: Detecting Pedestrians in a Crowdcited by 58
  10. 2016Is Faster R-CNN Doing Well for Pedestrian Detection?cited by 37
  11. 2019Mask-Guided Attention Network for Occluded Pedestrian Detectioncited by 36
  12. 2020NMS by Representative Region: Towards Crowded Pedestrian Detection by Proposal Pairingcited by 36
10 more
  1. 2019PedHunter: Occlusion Robust Pedestrian Detector in Crowded Scenescited by 30
  2. 2017Accurate Single Stage Detector Using Recurrent Rolling Convolutioncited by 27
  3. 2017What Can Help Pedestrian Detection?cited by 26
  4. 2017Illuminating Pedestrians via Simultaneous Detection & Segmentationcited by 26
  5. 2019Relational Learning for Joint Head and Human Detectioncited by 14
  6. 2018Pedestrian Detection with Autoregressive Network Phasescited by 12
  7. 2015Filtered Channel Features for Pedestrian Detectioncited by 11
  8. 2016Fused DNN: A deep neural network fusion approach to fast and robust pedestrian detectioncited by 10
  9. 2019SSA-CNN: Semantic Self-Attention CNN for Pedestrian Detectioncited by 6
  10. 2020Where, What, Whether: Multi-modal Learning Meets Pedestrian Detectioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.