Double Descent Optimization Pattern and Aliasing: Caveats of Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Optimization plays a key role in the training of deep neural networks. Deciding when to stop training can have a substantial impact on the performance of the network during inference. Under certain conditions, the generalization error can display a double descent pattern during training: the learning curve is non-monotonic and seemingly diverges before converging again after additional epochs. This optimization pattern can lead to early stopping procedures to stop training before the second convergence and consequently select a suboptimal set of parameters for the network, with worse performance during inference. In this work, in addition to confirming that double descent occurs with small datasets and noisy labels as evidenced by others, we show that noisy labels must be present both in the training and generalization sets to observe a double descent pattern. We also show that the learning rate has an influence on double descent, and study how different optimizers and optimizer parameters influence the apparition of double descent. Finally, we show that increasing the learning rate can create an aliasing effect that masks the double descent pattern without suppressing it. We study this phenomenon through extensive experiments on variants of CIFAR-10 and show that they translate to a real world application: the forecast of seizure events in epileptic patients from continuous electroencephalographic recordings.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2021.
Builds on
17 of 33 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
- 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
- 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 377
- 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
- 2019Two models of double descent for weak featurescited by 194
- 2019Harmless interpolation of noisy data in regressioncited by 121
5 more
- 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 65
- 2018The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networkscited by 61
- 2019How does Early Stopping Help Generalization against Label Noise?cited by 41
- 2019Understanding overfitting peaks in generalization error: Analytical risk curves for l2 and l1 penalized interpolationcited by 23
- 2019A New Look at an Old Problem: A Universal Learning Approach to Linear Regressioncited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.