mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Learning Based Analysis of Prostate Cancer from MP-MRI

arXiv 2106.01835 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2021eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The diagnosis of prostate cancer faces a problem with overdiagnosis that leads to damaging side effects due to unnecessary treatment. Research has shown that the use of multi-parametric magnetic resonance images to conduct biopsies can drastically help to mitigate the overdiagnosis, thus reducing the side effects on healthy patients. This study aims to investigate the use of deep learning techniques to explore computer-aid diagnosis based on MRI as input. Several diagnosis problems ranging from classification of lesions as being clinically significant or not to the detection and segmentation of lesions are addressed with deep learning based approaches. This thesis tackled two main problems regarding the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Firstly, XmasNet was used to conduct two large experiments on the classification of lesions. Secondly, detection and segmentation experiments were conducted, first on the prostate and afterward on the prostate cancer lesions. The former experiments explored the lesions through a two-dimensional space, while the latter explored models to work with three-dimensional inputs. For this task, the 3D models explored were the 3D U-Net and a pretrained 3D ResNet-18. A rigorous analysis of all these problems was conducted with a total of two networks, two cropping techniques, two resampling techniques, two crop sizes, five input sizes and data augmentations experimented for lesion classification. While for segmentation two models, two input sizes and data augmentations were experimented. However, while the binary classification of the clinical significance of lesions and the detection and segmentation of the prostate already achieve the desired results (0.870 AUC and 0.915 dice score respectively), the classification of the PIRADS score and the segmentation of lesions still have a large margin to improve (0.664 accuracy and 0.690 dice score respectively).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 106 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.

Builds on

19 of 106 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  3. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  4. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  5. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
  6. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,128
  7. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  8. 2017Focal Loss for Dense Object Detectioncited by 749
  9. 2017Can Spatiotemporal 3D CNNs Retrace the History of 2D CNNs and ImageNet?cited by 551
  10. 2019Med3D: Transfer Learning for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 282
  11. 2017Learning Spatio-Temporal Features with 3D Residual Networks for Action Recognitioncited by 178
  12. 2019Stereo R-CNN based 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 163
7 more
  1. 2019Mish: A Self Regularized Non-Monotonic Activation Functioncited by 141
  2. 2017Non-convex Optimization for Machine Learningcited by 132
  3. 2014Fractional Max-Poolingcited by 35
  4. 2019Prostate Cancer Detection using Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 15
  5. 2017Prostate Cancer Diagnosis using Deep Learning with 3D Multiparametric MRIcited by 7
  6. 2019A deep learning-based method for prostate segmentation in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imagingcited by 2
  7. 2019Breast Tumor Classification and Segmentation using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.