Weakly Supervised Learning Creates a Fusion of Modeling Cultures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The past two decades have witnessed the great success of the algorithmic modeling framework advocated by Breiman et al. (2001). Nevertheless, the excellent prediction performance of these black-box models rely heavily on the availability of strong supervision, i.e. a large set of accurate and exact ground-truth labels. In practice, strong supervision can be unavailable or expensive, which calls for modeling techniques under weak supervision. In this comment, we summarize the key concepts in weakly supervised learning and discuss some recent developments in the field. Using algorithmic modeling alone under a weak supervision might lead to unstable and misleading results. A promising direction would be integrating the data modeling culture into such a framework.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.
Builds on
7 of 33 references.
References · 7
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
- 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
- 2017Weakly-supervised learning of visual relationscited by 36
Built on by
Not cited yet.