mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BERT-Defense: A Probabilistic Model Based on BERT to Combat Cognitively Inspired Orthographic Adversarial Attacks

arXiv 2106.01452 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2021cs.CL cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial attacks expose important blind spots of deep learning systems. While word- and sentence-level attack scenarios mostly deal with finding semantic paraphrases of the input that fool NLP models, character-level attacks typically insert typos into the input stream. It is commonly thought that these are easier to defend via spelling correction modules. In this work, we show that both a standard spellchecker and the approach of Pruthi et al. (2019), which trains to defend against insertions, deletions and swaps, perform poorly on the character-level benchmark recently proposed in Eger and Benz (2020) which includes more challenging attacks such as visual and phonetic perturbations and missing word segmentations. In contrast, we show that an untrained iterative approach which combines context-independent character-level information with context-dependent information from BERT's masked language modeling can perform on par with human crowd-workers from Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) supervised via 3-shot learning.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  4. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
  5. 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 491
  6. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 424
  7. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 418
  8. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 306
  9. 2018Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networkscited by 286
  10. 2019Combating Adversarial Misspellings with Robust Word Recognitioncited by 163
  11. 2019Text Processing Like Humans Do: Visually Attacking and Shielding NLP Systemscited by 101
  12. 2018On Adversarial Examples for Character-Level Neural Machine Translationcited by 85
9 more
  1. 2020OpenAttack: An Open-source Textual Adversarial Attack Toolkitcited by 84
  2. 2020Robust Encodings: A Framework for Combating Adversarial Typoscited by 58
  3. 2019Learning to Discriminate Perturbations for Blocking Adversarial Attacks in Text Classificationcited by 57
  4. 2021Robust Open-Vocabulary Translation from Visual Text Representationscited by 47
  5. 2019Word-level Textual Adversarial Attacking as Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 37
  6. 2020From Hero to Z'eroe: A Benchmark of Low-Level Adversarial Attackscited by 36
  7. 2020Word Shape Matters: Robust Machine Translation with Visual Embeddingcited by 12
  8. 2021Token-Modification Adversarial Attacks for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 12
  9. 2021Misspelling Correction with Pre-trained Contextual Language Modelcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 7; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 3.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Navigating the Risks: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Ethics Threats in LLM-Based Agentscited by 65
  2. 2022Language Modelling with Pixelscited by 55
  3. 2022Detection of Word Adversarial Examples in Text Classification: Benchmark and Baseline via Robust Density Estimationcited by 32
  4. 2021Global Explainability of BERT-Based Evaluation Metrics by Disentangling along Linguistic Factorscited by 25
  5. 2022A Survey of Adversarial Defences and Robustness in NLPcited by 23
  6. 2022Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Natural Language Generationcited by 15
  7. 2022What do we Really Know about State of the Art NER?cited by 10
  8. 2022Layer or Representation Space: What makes BERT-based Evaluation Metrics Robust?cited by 10
  9. 2024DENOISER: Rethinking the Robustness for Open-Vocabulary Action Recognitioncited by 8
  10. 2023CitySpec with Shield: A Secure Intelligent Assistant for Requirement Formalizationcited by 7
  11. 2024Improving deep learning with prior knowledge and cognitive models: A survey on enhancing explainability, adversarial robustness and zero-shot learningcited by 4
  12. 2022Don't sweat the small stuff, classify the rest: Sample Shielding to protect text classifiers against adversarial attackscited by 3
5 more
  1. 2023The Best Defense is Attack: Repairing Semantics in Textual Adversarial Examplescited by 3
  2. 2025FLUKE: A Linguistically-Driven and Task-Agnostic Framework for Robustness Evaluationcited by 3
  3. 2024Compressed models are NOT miniature versions of large modelscited by 2
  4. 2025BitAbuse: A Dataset of Visually Perturbed Texts for Defending Phishing Attackscited by 2
  5. 2025NLP Security and Ethics, in the Wildcited by 2