mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Generalized Mean Densest Subgraph Problem

arXiv 2106.00909 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2021cs.DS cs.DM cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Finding dense subgraphs of a large graph is a standard problem in graph mining that has been studied extensively both for its theoretical richness and its many practical applications. In this paper we introduce a new family of dense subgraph objectives, parameterized by a single parameter p, based on computing generalized means of degree sequences of a subgraph. Our objective captures both the standard densest subgraph problem and the maximum k-core as special cases, and provides a way to interpolate between and extrapolate beyond these two objectives when searching for other notions of dense subgraphs. In terms of algorithmic contributions, we first show that our objective can be minimized in polynomial time for all p ≥ 1 using repeated submodular minimization. A major contribution of our work is analyzing the performance of different types of peeling algorithms for dense subgraphs both in theory and practice. We prove that the standard peeling algorithm can perform arbitrarily poorly on our generalized objective, but we then design a more sophisticated peeling method which for p ≥ 1 has an approximation guarantee that is always at least 1/2 and converges to 1 as p rightarrow ∞. In practice, we show that this algorithm obtains extremely good approximations to the optimal solution, scales to large graphs, and highlights a range of different meaningful notions of density on graphs coming from numerous domains. Furthermore, it is typically able to approximate the densest subgraph problem better than the standard peeling algorithm, by better accounting for how the removal of one node affects other nodes in its neighborhood.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.

Builds on

12 of 55 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Explainable Classification of Brain Networks via Contrast Subgraphscited by 26
  2. 2020Hypergraph Cuts with General Splitting Functionscited by 14
  3. 2017Unifying Sparsest Cut, Cluster Deletion, and Modularity Clustering Objectives with Correlation Clusteringcited by 12
  4. 2018Flow-Based Local Graph Clustering with Better Seed Set Inclusioncited by 8
  5. 2016Peeling Bipartite Networks for Dense Subgraph Discoverycited by 6
  6. 2016Correlation Clustering with Low-Rank Matricescited by 4
  7. 2020Augmented Sparsifiers for Generalized Hypergraph Cuts with Applications to Decomposable Submodular Function Minimizationcited by 4
  8. 2014Finding the Hierarchy of Dense Subgraphs using Nucleus Decompositionscited by 3
  9. 2017The Densest Subgraph Problem with a Convex/Concave Size Functioncited by 3
  10. 2019A Parallel Projection Method for Metric Constrained Optimizationcited by 3
  11. 2019Learning Resolution Parameters for Graph Clusteringcited by 3
  12. 2019Novel Dense Subgraph Discovery Primitives: Risk Aversion and Exclusion Queriescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.