Partial Wasserstein Covering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a general task called partial Wasserstein covering with the goal of providing information on what patterns are not being taken into account in a dataset (e.g., dataset used during development) compared with another dataset(e.g., dataset obtained from actual applications). We model this task as a discrete optimization problem with partial Wasserstein divergence as an objective function. Although this problem is NP-hard, we prove that it satisfies the submodular property, allowing us to use a greedy algorithm with a 0.63 approximation. However, the greedy algorithm is still inefficient because it requires solving linear programming for each objective function evaluation. To overcome this inefficiency, we propose quasi-greedy algorithms that consist of a series of acceleration techniques, such as sensitivity analysis based on strong duality and the so-called C-transform in the optimal transport field. Experimentally, we demonstrate that we can efficiently fill in the gaps between the two datasets and find missing scene in real driving scenes datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.
Builds on
11 of 59 references.
References · 11
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,282
- 2016Stochastic Optimization for Large-scale Optimal Transportcited by 188
- 2020Geometric Dataset Distances via Optimal Transportcited by 157
- 2019Deep Active Learning: Unified and Principled Method for Query and Trainingcited by 92
- 2017Practical Coreset Constructions for Machine Learningcited by 75
- 2019On Scalable and Efficient Computation of Large Scale Optimal Transportcited by 29
- 2018Data Summarization at Scale: A Two-Stage Submodular Approachcited by 14
- 2016Tight Approximation Bounds for the Seminar Assignment Problemcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2021On Multimarginal Partial Optimal Transport: Equivalent Forms and Computational Complexitycited by 8
- 2026UniPROT: Uniform Prototype Selection via Partial Optimal Transport with Submodular Guaranteescited by 2
- 2023StyleDiff: Attribute Comparison Between Unlabeled Datasets in Latent Disentangled Spacecited by 0
- 2026CoverPrune: Coverage-Driven Token Pruning for 3D VLMs via Optimal Transportcited by 0
- 2026CoverPrune: Coverage-Driven Token Pruning for 3D VLMs via Optimal Transport13 Aug 2026
- 2026UniPROT: Uniform Prototype Selection via Partial Optimal Transport with Submodular Guarantees13 Apr 2026
- 2023StyleDiff: Attribute Comparison Between Unlabeled Datasets in Latent Disentangled Space9 Mar 2023
- 2021On Multimarginal Partial Optimal Transport: Equivalent Forms and Computational Complexity18 Aug 2021