mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating Word Embeddings with Categorical Modularity

arXiv 2106.00877 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2021cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce categorical modularity, a novel low-resource intrinsic metric to evaluate word embedding quality. Categorical modularity is a graph modularity metric based on the k-nearest neighbor graph constructed with embedding vectors of words from a fixed set of semantic categories, in which the goal is to measure the proportion of words that have nearest neighbors within the same categories. We use a core set of 500 words belonging to 59 neurobiologically motivated semantic categories in 29 languages and analyze three word embedding models per language (FastText, MUSE, and subs2vec). We find moderate to strong positive correlations between categorical modularity and performance on the monolingual tasks of sentiment analysis and word similarity calculation and on the cross-lingual task of bilingual lexicon induction both to and from English. Overall, we suggest that categorical modularity provides non-trivial predictive information about downstream task performance, with breakdowns of correlations by model suggesting some meta-predictive properties about semantic information loss as well.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2021.

Builds on

12 of 31 references.

References · 12

  1. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  2. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  3. 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
  4. 2017A Survey Of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Modelscited by 142
  5. 2019How to (Properly) Evaluate Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings: On Strong Baselines, Comparative Analyses, and Some Misconceptionscited by 48
  6. 2019CogniVal: A Framework for Cognitive Word Embedding Evaluationcited by 27
  7. 2018A Survey of Word Embeddings Evaluation Methodscited by 26
  8. 2019Robust Evaluation of Language-Brain Encoding Experimentscited by 9
  9. 2019A Resource-Free Evaluation Metric for Cross-Lingual Word Embeddings Based on Graph Modularitycited by 5
  10. 2020Understanding the Downstream Instability of Word Embeddingscited by 4
  11. 2020Human brain activity for machine attentioncited by 4
  12. 2016Comparing Fifty Natural Languages and Twelve Genetic Languages Using Word Embedding Language Divergence (WELD) as a Quantitative Measure of Language Distancecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.