mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Finding the K-best Non-projective Dependency Trees

arXiv 2106.00780 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2021cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The connection between the maximum spanning tree in a directed graph and the best dependency tree of a sentence has been exploited by the NLP community. However, for many dependency parsing schemes, an important detail of this approach is that the spanning tree must have exactly one edge emanating from the root. While work has been done to efficiently solve this problem for finding the one-best dependency tree, no research has attempted to extend this solution to finding the K-best dependency trees. This is arguably a more important extension as a larger proportion of decoded trees will not be subject to the root constraint of dependency trees. Indeed, we show that the rate of root constraint violations increases by an average of 13 times when decoding with K!=!50 as opposed to K!=!1. In this paper, we provide a simplification of the K-best spanning tree algorithm of Camerini et al. (1980). Our simplification allows us to obtain a constant time speed-up over the original algorithm. Furthermore, we present a novel extension of the algorithm for decoding the K-best dependency trees of a graph which are subject to a root constraint.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2021.

Builds on

7 of 39 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
  2. 2016Deep Biaffine Attention for Neural Dependency Parsingcited by 334
  3. 2020Efficient Marginalization of Discrete and Structured Latent Variables via Sparsitycited by 21
  4. 2020Please Mind the Root: Decoding Arborescences for Dependency Parsingcited by 11
  5. 2016Global Neural CCG Parsing with Optimality Guaranteescited by 6
  6. 2017Neural Probabilistic Model for Non-projective MST Parsingcited by 6
  7. 2015A Re-ranking Model for Dependency Parser with Recursive Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2.

4 papers.