mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Please Mind the Root: Decoding Arborescences for Dependency Parsing

arXiv 2010.02550 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2020cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The connection between dependency trees and spanning trees is exploited by the NLP community to train and to decode graph-based dependency parsers. However, the NLP literature has missed an important difference between the two structures: only one edge may emanate from the root in a dependency tree. We analyzed the output of state-of-the-art parsers on many languages from the Universal Dependency Treebank: although these parsers are often able to learn that trees which violate the constraint should be assigned lower probabilities, their ability to do so unsurprisingly de-grades as the size of the training set decreases. In fact, the worst constraint-violation rate we observe is 24%. Prior work has proposed an inefficient algorithm to enforce the constraint, which adds a factor of n to the decoding runtime. We adapt an algorithm due to Gabow and Tarjan (1984) to dependency parsing, which satisfies the constraint without compromising the original runtime.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.

11 papers.