On the Interplay Between Fine-tuning and Composition in Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pre-trained transformer language models have shown remarkable performance on a variety of NLP tasks. However, recent research has suggested that phrase-level representations in these models reflect heavy influences of lexical content, but lack evidence of sophisticated, compositional phrase information. Here we investigate the impact of fine-tuning on the capacity of contextualized embeddings to capture phrase meaning information beyond lexical content. Specifically, we fine-tune models on an adversarial paraphrase classification task with high lexical overlap, and on a sentiment classification task. After fine-tuning, we analyze phrasal representations in controlled settings following prior work. We find that fine-tuning largely fails to benefit compositionality in these representations, though training on sentiment yields a small, localized benefit for certain models. In follow-up analyses, we identify confounding cues in the paraphrase dataset that may explain the lack of composition benefits from that task, and we discuss potential factors underlying the localized benefits from sentiment training.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2021.
Builds on
52 of 64 references.
References · 52
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 844
38 more
- 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 803
- 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 663
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
- 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 488
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
- 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 395
- 2018TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applicationscited by 376
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
- 2018SentEval: An Evaluation Toolkit for Universal Sentence Representationscited by 294
- 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
- 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 280
- 2019PAWS-X: A Cross-lingual Adversarial Dataset for Paraphrase Identificationcited by 262
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 260
- 2019Analyzing the Structure of Attention in a Transformer Language Modelcited by 241
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2019Probing Neural Network Comprehension of Natural Language Argumentscited by 212
- 2020Compositional Explanations of Neuronscited by 172
- 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
- 2018Dissecting Contextual Word Embeddings: Architecture and Representationcited by 146
- 2020Analyzing Individual Neurons in Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 97
- 2018How Much Reading Does Reading Comprehension Require? A Critical Investigation of Popular Benchmarkscited by 86
- 2019Measuring Compositionality in Representation Learningcited by 84
- 2016SimVerb-3500: A Large-Scale Evaluation Set of Verb Similaritycited by 44
- 2019Probing What Different NLP Tasks Teach Machines about Function Word Comprehensioncited by 44
- 2018Memorize or generalize? Searching for a compositional RNN in a haystackcited by 41
- 2020Assessing Phrasal Representation and Composition in Transformerscited by 41
- 2020On the Interplay Between Fine-tuning and Sentence-level Probing for Linguistic Knowledge in Pre-trained Transformerscited by 39
- 2020Spying on your neighbors: Fine-grained probing of contextual embeddings for information about surrounding wordscited by 28
- 2018Assessing Composition in Sentence Vector Representationscited by 26
- 2020Linguistic Profiling of a Neural Language Modelcited by 23
- 2020A Cross-Task Analysis of Text Span Representationscited by 21
- 2018Learning compositionally through attentive guidancecited by 11
- 2019Does BERT agree? Evaluating knowledge of structure dependence through agreement relationscited by 9
- 2020Meta Fine-Tuning Neural Language Models for Multi-Domain Text Miningcited by 6
50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
6 papers.
- 2021How Does Fine-tuning Affect the Geometry of Embedding Space: A Case Study on Isotropycited by 23
- 2022Predicting Fine-Tuning Performance with Probingcited by 13
- 2024Scope Ambiguities in Large Language Modelscited by 11
- 2024Semantics of Multiword Expressions in Transformer-Based Models: A Surveycited by 9
- 2022Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaningcited by 8
- 2023Towards Equipping Transformer with the Ability of Systematic Compositionalitycited by 2
- 2024Scope Ambiguities in Large Language Models5 Apr 2024
- 2024Semantics of Multiword Expressions in Transformer-Based Models: A Survey27 Jan 2024
- 2023Towards Equipping Transformer with the Ability of Systematic Compositionality12 Dec 2023
- 2022Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning14 Oct 2022
- 2022Predicting Fine-Tuning Performance with Probing13 Oct 2022
- 2021How Does Fine-tuning Affect the Geometry of Embedding Space: A Case Study on Isotropy10 Sep 2021