mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LRTuner: A Learning Rate Tuner for Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2105.14526 ↗First posted 30 May 2021cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One very important hyperparameter for training deep neural networks is the learning rate schedule of the optimizer. The choice of learning rate schedule determines the computational cost of getting close to a minima, how close you actually get to the minima, and most importantly the kind of local minima (wide/narrow) attained. The kind of minima attained has a significant impact on the generalization accuracy of the network. Current systems employ hand tuned learning rate schedules, which are painstakingly tuned for each network and dataset. Given that the state space of schedules is huge, finding a satisfactory learning rate schedule can be very time consuming. In this paper, we present LRTuner, a method for tuning the learning rate as training proceeds. Our method works with any optimizer, and we demonstrate results on SGD with Momentum, and Adam optimizers. We extensively evaluate LRTuner on multiple datasets, models, and across optimizers. We compare favorably against standard learning rate schedules for the given dataset and models, including ImageNet on Resnet-50, Cifar-10 on Resnet-18, and SQuAD fine-tuning on BERT. For example on ImageNet with Resnet-50, LRTuner shows up to 0.2% absolute gains in test accuracy compared to the hand-tuned baseline schedule. Moreover, LRTuner can achieve the same accuracy as the baseline schedule in 29% less optimization steps.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2021.

Builds on

24 of 36 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  6. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,492
  7. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
  8. 2019Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutescited by 674
  9. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 629
  10. 2016Entropy-SGD: Biasing Gradient Descent Into Wide Valleyscited by 359
  11. 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 307
  12. 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 292
12 more
  1. 2018An Empirical Model of Large-Batch Trainingcited by 281
  2. 2017Train longer, generalize better: closing the generalization gap in large batch training of neural networkscited by 279
  3. 2017Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGDcited by 273
  4. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 234
  5. 2018On the Relation Between the Sharpest Directions of DNN Loss and the SGD Step Lengthcited by 88
  6. 2019Shaping the learning landscape in neural networks around wide flat minimacited by 47
  7. 2018L4: Practical loss-based stepsize adaptation for deep learningcited by 26
  8. 2020Wide-minima Density Hypothesis and the Explore-Exploit Learning Rate Schedulecited by 25
  9. 2018Step Size Matters in Deep Learningcited by 19
  10. 2018Identifying Generalization Properties in Neural Networkscited by 15
  11. 2021AutoLRS: Automatic Learning-Rate Schedule by Bayesian Optimization on the Flycited by 14
  12. 2021Evolving Learning Rate Optimizers for Deep Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.