mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Risk-Aware Transfer in Reinforcement Learning using Successor Features

arXiv 2105.14127 ↗First posted 28 May 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sample efficiency and risk-awareness are central to the development of practical reinforcement learning (RL) for complex decision-making. The former can be addressed by transfer learning and the latter by optimizing some utility function of the return. However, the problem of transferring skills in a risk-aware manner is not well-understood. In this paper, we address the problem of risk-aware policy transfer between tasks in a common domain that differ only in their reward functions, in which risk is measured by the variance of reward streams. Our approach begins by extending the idea of generalized policy improvement to maximize entropic utilities, thus extending policy improvement via dynamic programming to sets of policies and levels of risk-aversion. Next, we extend the idea of successor features (SF), a value function representation that decouples the environment dynamics from the rewards, to capture the variance of returns. Our resulting risk-aware successor features (RaSF) integrate seamlessly within the RL framework, inherit the superior task generalization ability of SFs, and incorporate risk-awareness into the decision-making. Experiments on a discrete navigation domain and control of a simulated robotic arm demonstrate the ability of RaSFs to outperform alternative methods including SFs, when taking the risk of the learned policies into account.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2021.

Builds on

24 of 62 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
  2. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 765
  3. 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 340
  4. 2019Challenges of Real-World Reinforcement Learningcited by 291
  5. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning and the Deadly Triadcited by 174
  6. 2013Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learningcited by 130
  7. 2020Learning to be Safe: Deep RL with a Safety Criticcited by 116
  8. 2018Universal Successor Features Approximatorscited by 103
  9. 2019Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning Using Successor Features and Generalised Policy Improvementcited by 88
  10. 2020Safe Reinforcement Learning via Curriculum Inductioncited by 74
  11. 2020Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning: Near-Optimal Risk-Sample Tradeoff in Regretcited by 58
  12. 2019Risk-Averse Trust Region Optimization for Reward-Volatility Reductioncited by 54
12 more
  1. 2018Successor Uncertainties: Exploration and Uncertainty in Temporal Difference Learningcited by 35
  2. 2018Variance Reduction for Reinforcement Learning in Input-Driven Environmentscited by 30
  3. 2020Mean-Variance Policy Iteration for Risk-Averse Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  4. 2019Entropic Risk Measure in Policy Searchcited by 19
  5. 2018Learning Robust Optionscited by 17
  6. 2019Learning Robust Options by Conditional Value at Risk Optimizationcited by 16
  7. 2018Stochastic Approximation for Risk-aware Markov Decision Processescited by 10
  8. 2018Safe Option-Critic: Learning Safety in the Option-Critic Architecturecited by 10
  9. 2021Variance Penalized On-Policy and Off-Policy Actor-Criticcited by 10
  10. 2017Probabilistically Safe Policy Transfercited by 6
  11. 2019Borrowing From the Future: An Attempt to Address Double Samplingcited by 4
  12. 2016Situational Awareness by Risk-Conscious Skillscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

12 papers.