Demotivate adversarial defense in remote sensing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Convolutional neural networks are currently the state-of-the-art algorithms for many remote sensing applications such as semantic segmentation or object detection. However, these algorithms are extremely sensitive to over-fitting, domain change and adversarial examples specifically designed to fool them. While adversarial attacks are not a threat in most remote sensing applications, one could wonder if strengthening networks to adversarial attacks could also increase their resilience to over-fitting and their ability to deal with the inherent variety of worldwide data. In this work, we study both adversarial retraining and adversarial regularization as adversarial defenses to this purpose. However, we show through several experiments on public remote sensing datasets that adversarial robustness seems uncorrelated to geographic and over-fitting robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2021.
Builds on
10 of 19 references.
References · 10
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,130
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 790
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 686
- 2018Limitations of the Lipschitz constant as a defense against adversarial examplescited by 49
- 2019Adversarial Example in Remote Sensing Image Recognitioncited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.
2 papers.