Adversarial Example in Remote Sensing Image Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the wide application of remote sensing technology in various fields, the accuracy and security requirements for remote sensing images (RSIs) recognition are also increasing. In recent years, due to the rapid development of deep learning in the field of image recognition, RSI recognition models based on deep convolution neural networks (CNNs) outperform traditional hand-craft feature techniques. However, CNNs also pose security issues when they show their capability of accurate classification. By adding a very small variation of the adversarial perturbation to the input image, the CNN model can be caused to produce erroneous results with extremely high confidence, and the modification of the image is not perceived by the human eye. This added adversarial perturbation image is called an adversarial example, which poses a serious security problem for systems based on CNN model recognition results. This paper, for the first time, analyzes adversarial example problem of RSI recognition under CNN models. In the experiments, we used different attack algorithms to fool multiple high-accuracy RSI recognition models trained on multiple RSI datasets. The results show that RSI recognition models are also vulnerable to adversarial examples, and the models with different structures trained on the same RSI dataset also have different vulnerabilities. For each RSI dataset, the number of features also affects the vulnerability of the model. Many features are good for defensive adversarial examples. Further, we find that the attacked class of RSI has an attack selectivity property. The misclassification of adversarial examples of the RSIs are related to the similarity of the original classes in the CNN feature space. In addition, adversarial examples in RSI recognition are of great significance for the security of remote sensing applications, showing a huge potential for future research.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2022A Survey on Physical Adversarial Attack in Computer Visioncited by 25
- 2022Universal Adversarial Examples in Remote Sensing: Methodology and Benchmarkcited by 24
- 2022AI Security for Geoscience and Remote Sensing: Challenges and Future Trendscited by 23
- 2021Demotivate adversarial defense in remote sensingcited by 2
- 2024Cloud Adversarial Example Generation for Remote Sensing Image Classificationcited by 2
- 2026Physically-Induced Atmospheric Adversarial Perturbations: Enhancing Transferability and Robustness in Remote Sensing Image Classificationcited by 1
- 2025Boosting Adversarial Transferability for Hyperspectral Image Classification Using 3D Structure-invariant Transformation and Weighted Intermediate Feature Divergencecited by 0
- 2026On the Adversarial Robustness of Remote Sensing Semantic Change Detectioncited by 0
- 2026On the Adversarial Robustness of Remote Sensing Semantic Change Detection15 Aug 2026
- 2026Physically-Induced Atmospheric Adversarial Perturbations: Enhancing Transferability and Robustness in Remote Sensing Image Classification16 Apr 2026
- 2025Boosting Adversarial Transferability for Hyperspectral Image Classification Using 3D Structure-invariant Transformation and Weighted Intermediate Feature Divergence12 Jun 2025
- 2024Cloud Adversarial Example Generation for Remote Sensing Image Classification21 Sep 2024
- 2022AI Security for Geoscience and Remote Sensing: Challenges and Future Trends19 Dec 2022
- 2022A Survey on Physical Adversarial Attack in Computer Vision28 Sep 2022
- 2022Universal Adversarial Examples in Remote Sensing: Methodology and Benchmark14 Feb 2022
- 2021Demotivate adversarial defense in remote sensing28 May 2021