mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Heterogeneous Data Fusion Considering Spatial Correlations using Graph Convolutional Networks and its Application in Air Quality Prediction

arXiv 2105.13125 ↗First posted 24 May 2021cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Heterogeneous data are commonly adopted as the inputs for some models that predict the future trends of some observations. Existing predictive models typically ignore the inconsistencies and imperfections in heterogeneous data while also failing to consider the (1) spatial correlations among monitoring points or (2) predictions for the entire study area. To address the above problems, this paper proposes a deep learning method for fusing heterogeneous data collected from multiple monitoring points using graph convolutional networks (GCNs) to predict the future trends of some observations and evaluates its effectiveness by applying it in an air quality predictions scenario. The essential idea behind the proposed method is to (1) fuse the collected heterogeneous data based on the locations of the monitoring points with regard to their spatial correlations and (2) perform prediction based on global information rather than local information. In the proposed method, first, we assemble a fusion matrix using the proposed RBF-based fusion approach; second, based on the fused data, we construct spatially and temporally correlated data as inputs for the predictive model; finally, we employ the spatiotemporal graph convolutional network (STGCN) to predict the future trends of some observations. In the application scenario of air quality prediction, it is observed that (1) the fused data derived from the RBF-based fusion approach achieve satisfactory consistency; (2) the performances of the prediction models based on fused data are better than those based on raw data; and (3) the STGCN model achieves the best performance when compared to those of all baseline models. The proposed method is applicable for similar scenarios where continuous heterogeneous data are collected from multiple monitoring points scattered across a study area.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2021.

Builds on

17 of 81 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  5. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  6. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
  7. 2017Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Forecastingcited by 1,136
  8. 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 787
  9. 2015Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprintscited by 754
  10. 2016Language Modeling with Gated Convolutional Networkscited by 702
  11. 2018T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic Predictioncited by 401
  12. 2018Deep Learning on Graphs: A Surveycited by 393
5 more
  1. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 385
  2. 2018On a 'Two Truths' Phenomenon in Spectral Graph Clusteringcited by 24
  3. 2019Self-Calibration Methods for Uncontrolled Environments in Sensor Networks: A Reference Surveycited by 6
  4. 2019LaplacianNet: Learning on 3D Meshes with Laplacian Encoding and Poolingcited by 5
  5. 2020An algorithm for network community structure determination by surprisecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.