CrystalCandle: A User-Facing Model Explainer for Narrative Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Predictive machine learning models often lack interpretability, resulting in low trust from model end users despite having high predictive performance. While many model interpretation approaches return top important features to help interpret model predictions, these top features may not be well-organized or intuitive to end users, which limits model adoption rates. In this paper, we propose CrystalCandle, a user-facing model explainer that creates user-digestible interpretations and insights reflecting the rationale behind model predictions. CrystalCandle builds an end-to-end pipeline from machine learning platforms to end user platforms, and provides users with an interface for implementing model interpretation approaches and for customizing narrative insights. CrystalCandle is a platform consisting of four components: Model Importer, Model Interpreter, Narrative Generator, and Narrative Exporter. We describe these components, and then demonstrate the effectiveness of CrystalCandle through use cases at LinkedIn. Quantitative performance analyses indicate that CrystalCandle's narrative insights lead to lifts in adoption rates of predictive model recommendations, as well as to increases in downstream key metrics such as revenue when compared to previous approaches, while qualitative analyses indicate positive feedback from end users.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2021.
Builds on
14 of 28 references.
References · 14
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 657
- 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 243
- 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
- 2016Generating Visual Explanationscited by 156
- 2017Neural Rating Regression with Abstractive Tips Generation for Recommendationcited by 50
- 2018Explainable Recommendation via Multi-Task Learning in Opinionated Text Datacited by 40
- 2019The FacT: Taming Latent Factor Models for Explainability with Factorization Treescited by 27
- 2017Automatic Generation of Natural Language Explanationscited by 22
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.