Revisiting Additive Compositionality: AND, OR and NOT Operations with Word Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is well-known that typical word embedding methods such as Word2Vec and GloVe have the property that the meaning can be composed by adding up the embeddings (additive compositionality). Several theories have been proposed to explain additive compositionality, but the following questions remain unanswered: (Q1) The assumptions of those theories do not hold for the practical word embedding. (Q2) Ordinary additive compositionality can be seen as an AND operation of word meanings, but it is not well understood how other operations, such as OR and NOT, can be computed by the embeddings. We address these issues by the idea of frequency-weighted centering at its core. This paper proposes a post-processing method for bridging the gap between practical word embedding and the assumption of theory about additive compositionality as an answer to (Q1). It also gives a method for taking OR or NOT of the meaning by linear operation of word embedding as an answer to (Q2). Moreover, we confirm experimentally that the accuracy of AND operation, i.e., the ordinary additive compositionality, can be improved by our post-processing method (3.5x improvement in top-100 accuracy) and that OR and NOT operations can be performed correctly.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2021.
Builds on
11 of 29 references.
References · 11
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,918
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 212
- 2016Linear Algebraic Structure of Word Senses, with Applications to Polysemycited by 165
- 2019Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddingscited by 64
- 2018Towards Understanding Linear Word Analogiescited by 57
- 2020Word Rotator's Distancecited by 32
- 2016E-commerce in Your Inbox: Product Recommendations at Scalecited by 28
- 2015Measuring Word Significance using Distributed Representations of Wordscited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024When does compositional structure yield compositional generalization? A kernel theorycited by 20
- 2024PaCE: Parsimonious Concept Engineering for Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2024Do Large Language Models Advocate for Inferentialism?cited by 1
- 2026Geo-Spatial Concept Probing of Large Language Models: Abstraction, Compositionality, and Groundingcited by 0
- 2026Geo-Spatial Concept Probing of Large Language Models: Abstraction, Compositionality, and Grounding7 Aug 2026
- 2024Do Large Language Models Advocate for Inferentialism?19 Dec 2024
- 2024PaCE: Parsimonious Concept Engineering for Large Language Models6 Jun 2024
- 2024When does compositional structure yield compositional generalization? A kernel theory26 May 2024