A Cognitive Regularizer for Language Modeling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The uniform information density (UID) hypothesis, which posits that speakers behaving optimally tend to distribute information uniformly across a linguistic signal, has gained traction in psycholinguistics as an explanation for certain syntactic, morphological, and prosodic choices. In this work, we explore whether the UID hypothesis can be operationalized as an inductive bias for statistical language modeling. Specifically, we augment the canonical MLE objective for training language models with a regularizer that encodes UID. In experiments on ten languages spanning five language families, we find that using UID regularization consistently improves perplexity in language models, having a larger effect when training data is limited. Moreover, via an analysis of generated sequences, we find that UID-regularized language models have other desirable properties, e.g., they generate text that is more lexically diverse. Our results not only suggest that UID is a reasonable inductive bias for language modeling, but also provide an alternative validation of the UID hypothesis using modern-day NLP tools.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2021.
Builds on
14 of 51 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,488
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2020If beam search is the answer, what was the question?cited by 116
- 2017On the State of the Art of Evaluation in Neural Language Modelscited by 104
- 2018Are All Languages Equally Hard to Language-Model?cited by 53
- 2019What Kind of Language Is Hard to Language-Model?cited by 50
- 2018Importance of Search and Evaluation Strategies in Neural Dialogue Modelingcited by 44
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
11 papers.
- 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothingcited by 123
- 2021Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesiscited by 68
- 2021Lower Perplexity is Not Always Human-Likecited by 52
- 2023GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detectorcited by 40
- 2023Information Value: Measuring Utterance Predictability as Distance from Plausible Alternativescited by 23
- 2022On the probability-quality paradox in language generationcited by 16
- 2023Revisiting Entropy Rate Constancy in Textcited by 7
- 2023How do decoding algorithms distribute information in dialogue responses?cited by 3
- 2025Unexplored flaws in multiple-choice VQA make benchmarking unreliablecited by 1
- 2024Thesis proposal: Are We Losing Textual Diversity to Natural Language Processing?cited by 0
- 2025Confidence Regularized Masked Language Modeling using Text Lengthcited by 0
- 2025Unexplored flaws in multiple-choice VQA make benchmarking unreliable27 Nov 2025
- 2025Confidence Regularized Masked Language Modeling using Text Length8 Apr 2025
- 2024Thesis proposal: Are We Losing Textual Diversity to Natural Language Processing?15 Sep 2024
- 2023Information Value: Measuring Utterance Predictability as Distance from Plausible Alternatives20 Oct 2023
- 2023GPT-who: An Information Density-based Machine-Generated Text Detector9 Oct 2023
- 2023Revisiting Entropy Rate Constancy in Text20 May 2023
- 2023How do decoding algorithms distribute information in dialogue responses?29 Mar 2023
- 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothing27 Oct 2022
- 2022On the probability-quality paradox in language generation31 Mar 2022
- 2021Revisiting the Uniform Information Density Hypothesis23 Sep 2021
- 2021Lower Perplexity is Not Always Human-Like2 Jun 2021