mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Troubleshooting Blind Image Quality Models in the Wild

arXiv 2105.06747 ↗First posted 14 May 2021cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, the group maximum differentiation competition (gMAD) has been used to improve blind image quality assessment (BIQA) models, with the help of full-reference metrics. When applying this type of approach to troubleshoot "best-performing" BIQA models in the wild, we are faced with a practical challenge: it is highly nontrivial to obtain stronger competing models for efficient failure-spotting. Inspired by recent findings that difficult samples of deep models may be exposed through network pruning, we construct a set of "self-competitors," as random ensembles of pruned versions of the target model to be improved. Diverse failures can then be efficiently identified via self-gMAD competition. Next, we fine-tune both the target and its pruned variants on the human-rated gMAD set. This allows all models to learn from their respective failures, preparing themselves for the next round of self-gMAD competition. Experimental results demonstrate that our method efficiently troubleshoots BIQA models in the wild with improved generalizability.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2021.

Builds on

22 of 55 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  3. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  4. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
  5. 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 676
  6. 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
  7. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 583
  8. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 541
  9. 2018Filter Pruning via Geometric Median for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Accelerationcited by 367
  10. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
  11. 2017Snapshot Ensembles: Train 1, get M for freecited by 350
  12. 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 302
10 more
  1. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 225
  2. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223
  3. 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 209
  4. 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 171
  5. 2019Drawing Early-Bird Tickets: Towards More Efficient Training of Deep Networkscited by 160
  6. 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
  7. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 134
  8. 2019Stabilizing the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 37
  9. 2018Active Learning for Regression Using Greedy Samplingcited by 26
  10. 2020Active Fine-Tuning from gMAD Examples Improves Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 24

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: