mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Causal Networks and Freedom of Choice in Bell's Theorem

arXiv 2105.05721 ↗First posted 12 May 2021quant-ph stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bell's theorem is typically understood as the proof that quantum theory is incompatible with local-hidden-variable models. More generally, we can see the violation of a Bell inequality as witnessing the impossibility of explaining quantum correlations with classical causal models. The violation of a Bell inequality, however, does not exclude classical models where some level of measurement dependence is allowed, that is, the choice made by observers can be correlated with the source generating the systems to be measured. Here, we show that the level of measurement dependence can be quantitatively upper bounded if we arrange the Bell test within a network. Furthermore, we also prove that these results can be adapted in order to derive nonlinear Bell inequalities for a large class of causal networks and to identify quantumly realizable correlations that violate them.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2021.

Builds on

5 of 83 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016The Inflation Technique for Causal Inference with Latent Variablescited by 11
  2. 2014Inferring latent structures via information inequalitiescited by 6
  3. 2014Beyond Bell's Theorem II: Scenarios with arbitrary causal structurecited by 4
  4. 2014A unifying framework for relaxations of the causal assumptions in Bell's theoremcited by 3
  5. 2017Semidefinite tests for latent causal structurescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.