Accountable Error Characterization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Customers of machine learning systems demand accountability from the companies employing these algorithms for various prediction tasks. Accountability requires understanding of system limit and condition of erroneous predictions, as customers are often interested in understanding the incorrect predictions, and model developers are absorbed in finding methods that can be used to get incremental improvements to an existing system. Therefore, we propose an accountable error characterization method, AEC, to understand when and where errors occur within the existing black-box models. AEC, as constructed with human-understandable linguistic features, allows the model developers to automatically identify the main sources of errors for a given classification system. It can also be used to sample for the set of most informative input points for a next round of training. We perform error detection for a sentiment analysis task using AEC as a case study. Our results on the sample sentiment task show that AEC is able to characterize erroneous predictions into human understandable categories and also achieves promising results on selecting erroneous samples when compared with the uncertainty-based sampling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2021.
Builds on
12 of 24 references.
References · 12
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 342
- 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 276
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2018Under the Hood: Using Diagnostic Classifiers to Investigate and Improve how Language Models Track Agreement Informationcited by 97
- 2018Towards Explainable NLP: A Generative Explanation Framework for Text Classificationcited by 55
- 2018Towards Accountable AI: Hybrid Human-Machine Analyses for Characterizing System Failurecited by 49
- 2017Measuring the Similarity of Sentential Arguments in Dialogcited by 23
- 2019Learning to Sample: an Active Learning Frameworkcited by 11
- 2017"How May I Help You?": Modeling Twitter Customer Service Conversations Using Fine-Grained Dialogue Actscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.