Learning to Sample: an Active Learning Framework
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Meta-learning algorithms for active learning are emerging as a promising paradigm for learning the ``best'' active learning strategy. However, current learning-based active learning approaches still require sufficient training data so as to generalize meta-learning models for active learning. This is contrary to the nature of active learning which typically starts with a small number of labeled samples. The unavailability of large amounts of labeled samples for training meta-learning models would inevitably lead to poor performance (e.g., instabilities and overfitting). In our paper, we tackle these issues by proposing a novel learning-based active learning framework, called Learning To Sample (LTS). This framework has two key components: a sampling model and a boosting model, which can mutually learn from each other in iterations to improve the performance of each other. Within this framework, the sampling model incorporates uncertainty sampling and diversity sampling into a unified process for optimization, enabling us to actively select the most representative and informative samples based on an optimized integration of uncertainty and diversity. To evaluate the effectiveness of the LTS framework, we have conducted extensive experiments on three different classification tasks: image classification, salary level prediction, and entity resolution. The experimental results show that our LTS framework significantly outperforms all the baselines when the label budget is limited, especially for datasets with highly imbalanced classes. In addition to this, our LTS framework can effectively tackle the cold start problem occurring in many existing active learning approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 6; 2024: 1.
11 papers.
- 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontierscited by 53
- 2023Algorithm Selection for Deep Active Learning with Imbalanced Datasetscited by 18
- 2022Does Configuration Encoding Matter in Learning Software Performance? An Empirical Study on Encoding Schemescited by 10
- 2023Topic-Guided Sampling For Data-Efficient Multi-Domain Stance Detectioncited by 4
- 2021Addressing practical challenges in Active Learning via a hybrid query strategycited by 2
- 2023How To Overcome Confirmation Bias in Semi-Supervised Image Classification By Active Learningcited by 2
- 2023Importance of negative sampling in weak label learningcited by 1
- 2021Accountable Error Characterizationcited by 0
- 2022Reinforced Meta Active Learningcited by 0
- 2023Hazards in Deep Learning Testing: Prevalence, Impact and Recommendationscited by 0
- 2023Towards Comparable Active Learningcited by 0
- 2024A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontiers1 May 2024
- 2023Towards Comparable Active Learning30 Nov 2023
- 2023Importance of negative sampling in weak label learning23 Sep 2023
- 2023Hazards in Deep Learning Testing: Prevalence, Impact and Recommendations11 Sep 2023
- 2023How To Overcome Confirmation Bias in Semi-Supervised Image Classification By Active Learning16 Aug 2023
- 2023Topic-Guided Sampling For Data-Efficient Multi-Domain Stance Detection1 Jun 2023
- 2023Algorithm Selection for Deep Active Learning with Imbalanced Datasets14 Feb 2023
- 2022Does Configuration Encoding Matter in Learning Software Performance? An Empirical Study on Encoding Schemes30 Mar 2022
- 2022Reinforced Meta Active Learning9 Mar 2022
- 2021Addressing practical challenges in Active Learning via a hybrid query strategy7 Oct 2021
- 2021Accountable Error Characterization10 May 2021