mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Empirical Evaluation of Pre-trained Transformers for Human-Level NLP: The Role of Sample Size and Dimensionality

arXiv 2105.03484 ↗First posted 7 May 2021cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In human-level NLP tasks, such as predicting mental health, personality, or demographics, the number of observations is often smaller than the standard 768+ hidden state sizes of each layer within modern transformer-based language models, limiting the ability to effectively leverage transformers. Here, we provide a systematic study on the role of dimension reduction methods (principal components analysis, factorization techniques, or multi-layer auto-encoders) as well as the dimensionality of embedding vectors and sample sizes as a function of predictive performance. We first find that fine-tuning large models with a limited amount of data pose a significant difficulty which can be overcome with a pre-trained dimension reduction regime. RoBERTa consistently achieves top performance in human-level tasks, with PCA giving benefit over other reduction methods in better handling users that write longer texts. Finally, we observe that a majority of the tasks achieve results comparable to the best performance with just frac112 of the embedding dimensions.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2021.

Builds on

22 of 66 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  7. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  8. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  9. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  10. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  11. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,140
  12. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
10 more
  1. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
  2. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  3. 2019How to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification?cited by 409
  4. 2020On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselinescited by 254
  5. 2019SMART: Robust and Efficient Fine-Tuning for Pre-trained Natural Language Models through Principled Regularized Optimizationcited by 253
  6. 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 205
  7. 2020Byte Pair Encoding is Suboptimal for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 189
  8. 2019Predictive Biases in Natural Language Processing Models: A Conceptual Framework and Overviewcited by 137
  9. 2017Simple and Effective Dimensionality Reduction for Word Embeddingscited by 38
  10. 2019Specializing Word Embeddings (for Parsing) by Information Bottleneckcited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort: