Two4Two: Evaluating Interpretable Machine Learning - A Synthetic Dataset For Controlled Experiments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A growing number of approaches exist to generate explanations for image classification. However, few of these approaches are subjected to human-subject evaluations, partly because it is challenging to design controlled experiments with natural image datasets, as they leave essential factors out of the researcher's control. With our approach, researchers can describe their desired dataset with only a few parameters. Based on these, our library generates synthetic image data of two 3D abstract animals. The resulting data is suitable for algorithmic as well as human-subject evaluations. Our user study results demonstrate that our method can create biases predictive enough for a classifier and subtle enough to be noticeable only to every second participant inspecting the data visually. Our approach significantly lowers the barrier for conducting human subject evaluations, thereby facilitating more rigorous investigations into interpretable machine learning. For our library and datasets see, https://github.com/mschuessler/two4two/
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2021.
Builds on
15 of 21 references.
References · 15
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 312
- 2020Debugging Tests for Model Explanationscited by 146
- 2019When Explanations Lie: Why Many Modified BP Attributions Failcited by 92
- 2019Benchmarking Attribution Methods with Relative Feature Importancecited by 89
- 2020Evaluating Saliency Map Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networks: A User Studycited by 86
- 2019Explanation by Progressive Exaggerationcited by 76
- 2018A Theoretical Explanation for Perplexing Behaviors of Backpropagation-based Visualizationscited by 59
- 2020Towards falsifiable interpretability researchcited by 53
- 2020A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systemscited by 45
3 more
- 2020How Useful Are the Machine-Generated Interpretations to General Users? A Human Evaluation on Guessing the Incorrectly Predicted Labelscited by 39
- 2020Are Visual Explanations Useful? A Case Study in Model-in-the-Loop Predictioncited by 36
- 2020Exemplary Natural Images Explain CNN Activations Better than State-of-the-Art Feature Visualizationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.