mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bird's Eye: Probing for Linguistic Graph Structures with a Simple Information-Theoretic Approach

arXiv 2105.02629 ↗First posted 6 May 2021cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

NLP has a rich history of representing our prior understanding of language in the form of graphs. Recent work on analyzing contextualized text representations has focused on hand-designed probe models to understand how and to what extent do these representations encode a particular linguistic phenomenon. However, due to the inter-dependence of various phenomena and randomness of training probe models, detecting how these representations encode the rich information in these linguistic graphs remains a challenging problem. In this paper, we propose a new information-theoretic probe, Bird's Eye, which is a fairly simple probe method for detecting if and how these representations encode the information in these linguistic graphs. Instead of using classifier performance, our probe takes an information-theoretic view of probing and estimates the mutual information between the linguistic graph embedded in a continuous space and the contextualized word representations. Furthermore, we also propose an approach to use our probe to investigate localized linguistic information in the linguistic graphs using perturbation analysis. We call this probing setup Worm's Eye. Using these probes, we analyze BERT models on their ability to encode a syntactic and a semantic graph structure, and find that these models encode to some degree both syntactic as well as semantic information; albeit syntactic information to a greater extent.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2021.

Builds on

22 of 53 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  3. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  4. 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
  5. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  6. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
  7. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
  8. 2018MINE: Mutual Information Neural Estimationcited by 680
  9. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
  10. 2015LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embeddingcited by 582
  11. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  12. 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 436
10 more
  1. 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 382
  2. 2017A Comprehensive Survey of Graph Embedding: Problems, Techniques and Applicationscited by 260
  3. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 230
  4. 2019Visualizing and Measuring the Geometry of BERTcited by 215
  5. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 204
  6. 2018Evaluating Layers of Representation in Neural Machine Translation on Part-of-Speech and Semantic Tagging Taskscited by 56
  7. 2020Pareto Probing: Trading Off Accuracy for Complexitycited by 55
  8. 2014Efficient Estimation of Mutual Information for Strongly Dependent Variablescited by 46
  9. 2020Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependenciescited by 18
  10. 2020VCDM: Leveraging Variational Bi-encoding and Deep Contextualized Word Representations for Improved Definition Modelingcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.