mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improved Analysis and Rates for Variance Reduction under Without-replacement Sampling Orders

arXiv 2104.12112 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2021cs.LG math.OCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When applying a stochastic algorithm, one must choose an order to draw samples. The practical choices are without-replacement sampling orders, which are empirically faster and more cache-friendly than uniform-iid-sampling but often have inferior theoretical guarantees. Without-replacement sampling is well understood only for SGD without variance reduction. In this paper, we will improve the convergence analysis and rates of variance reduction under without-replacement sampling orders for composite finite-sum minimization. Our results are in two-folds. First, we develop a damped variant of Finito called Prox-DFinito and establish its convergence rates with random reshuffling, cyclic sampling, and shuffling-once, under both convex and strongly convex scenarios. These rates match full-batch gradient descent and are state-of-the-art compared to the existing results for without-replacement sampling with variance-reduction. Second, our analysis can gauge how the cyclic order will influence the rate of cyclic sampling and, thus, allows us to derive the optimal fixed ordering. In the highly data-heterogeneous scenario, Prox-DFinito with optimal cyclic sampling can attain a sample-size-independent convergence rate, which, to our knowledge, is the first result that can match with uniform-iid-sampling with variance reduction. We also propose a practical method to discover the optimal cyclic ordering numerically.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2021.

Builds on

26 of 40 references.

References · 26

  1. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,140
  2. 2014SAGA: A Fast Incremental Gradient Method With Support for Non-Strongly Convex Composite Objectivescited by 401
  3. 2013Minimizing Finite Sums with the Stochastic Average Gradientcited by 164
  4. 2020Random Reshuffling: Simple Analysis with Vast Improvementscited by 112
  5. 2014Stochastic Optimization with Importance Samplingcited by 91
  6. 2015Why Random Reshuffling Beats Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 78
  7. 2018Random Shuffling Beats SGD after Finite Epochscited by 66
  8. 2019How Good is SGD with Random Shuffling?cited by 63
  9. 2019SGD without Replacement: Sharper Rates for General Smooth Convex Functionscited by 59
  10. 2020Closing the convergence gap of SGD without replacementcited by 56
  11. 2014Incremental Majorization-Minimization Optimization with Application to Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 35
  12. 2021Proximal and Federated Random Reshufflingcited by 33
14 more
  1. 2015On the Convergence Rate of Incremental Aggregated Gradient Algorithmscited by 21
  2. 2021Random Reshuffling with Variance Reduction: New Analysis and Better Ratescited by 19
  3. 2018Stochastic Learning under Random Reshuffling with Constant Step-sizescited by 14
  4. 2016Surpassing Gradient Descent Provably: A Cyclic Incremental Method with Linear Convergence Ratecited by 12
  5. 2016Global Convergence Rate of Proximal Incremental Aggregated Gradient Methodscited by 11
  6. 2014Finito: A Faster, Permutable Incremental Gradient Method for Big Data Problemscited by 10
  7. 2018Linear Convergence of Cyclic SAGAcited by 9
  8. 2016Cyclic Coordinate Update Algorithms for Fixed-Point Problems: Analysis and Applicationscited by 6
  9. 2019General Proximal Incremental Aggregated Gradient Algorithms: Better and Novel Results under General Schemecited by 6
  10. 2019Scaled Relative Graph: Nonexpansive operators via 2D Euclidean Geometrycited by 5
  11. 2019MISO is Making a Comeback With Better Proofs and Ratescited by 5
  12. 2020Understanding the Impact of Model Incoherence on Convergence of Incremental SGD with Random Reshufflecited by 4
  13. 2016A Stronger Convergence Result on the Proximal Incremental Aggregated Gradient Methodcited by 3
  14. 2019Tight Coefficients of Averaged Operators via Scaled Relative Graphcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

13 papers.

Sort: