Evaluating Deception Detection Model Robustness To Linguistic Variation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the increasing use of machine-learning driven algorithmic judgements, it is critical to develop models that are robust to evolving or manipulated inputs. We propose an extensive analysis of model robustness against linguistic variation in the setting of deceptive news detection, an important task in the context of misinformation spread online. We consider two prediction tasks and compare three state-of-the-art embeddings to highlight consistent trends in model performance, high confidence misclassifications, and high impact failures. By measuring the effectiveness of adversarial defense strategies and evaluating model susceptibility to adversarial attacks using character- and word-perturbed text, we find that character or mixed ensemble models are the most effective defenses and that character perturbation-based attack tactics are more successful.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2021.
Builds on
24 of 55 references.
References · 24
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
- 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
12 more
- 2017"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detectioncited by 361
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
- 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
- 2018Visual Analytics in Deep Learning: An Interrogative Survey for the Next Frontierscited by 117
- 2017Deep Text Classification Can be Fooledcited by 105
- 2017Beyond News Contents: The Role of Social Context for Fake News Detectioncited by 91
- 2015Analysis of classifiers' robustness to adversarial perturbationscited by 76
- 2017Towards Crafting Text Adversarial Samplescited by 55
- 2017An Army of Me: Sockpuppets in Online Discussion Communitiescited by 18
- 2018Fake News Identification on Twitter with Hybrid CNN and RNN Modelscited by 17
- 2017Discourse-Aware Rumour Stance Classification in Social Media Using Sequential Classifierscited by 14
- 2018How Humans versus Bots React to Deceptive and Trusted News Sources: A Case Study of Active Userscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.