mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CapillaryNet: An Automated System to Quantify Skin Capillary Density and Red Blood Cell Velocity from Handheld Vital Microscopy

arXiv 2104.11574 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2021eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Capillaries are the smallest vessels in the body responsible for delivering oxygen and nutrients to surrounding cells. Various life-threatening diseases are known to alter the density of healthy capillaries and the flow velocity of erythrocytes within the capillaries. In previous studies, capillary density and flow velocity were manually assessed by trained specialists. However, manual analysis of a standard 20-second microvascular video requires 20 minutes on average and necessitates extensive training. Thus, manual analysis has been reported to hinder the application of microvascular microscopy in a clinical environment. To address this problem, this paper presents a fully automated state-of-the-art system to quantify skin nutritive capillary density and red blood cell velocity captured by handheld-based microscopy videos. The proposed method combines the speed of traditional computer vision algorithms with the accuracy of convolutional neural networks to enable clinical capillary analysis. The results show that the proposed system fully automates capillary detection with an accuracy exceeding that of trained analysts and measures several novel microvascular parameters that had eluded quantification thus far, namely, capillary hematocrit and intracapillary flow velocity heterogeneity. The proposed end-to-end system, named CapillaryNet, can detect capillaries at ~0.9 seconds per frame with ~93% accuracy. The system is currently being used as a clinical research product in a larger e-health application to analyse capillary data captured from patients suffering from COVID-19, pancreatitis, and acute heart diseases. CapillaryNet narrows the gap between the analysis of microcirculation images in a clinical environment and state-of-the-art systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2021.

Builds on

19 of 108 references.

References · 19

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  6. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  7. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  8. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  9. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,463
  10. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  11. 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 524
  12. 2018Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networkcited by 415
7 more
  1. 2019Salient Object Detection in the Deep Learning Era: An In-Depth Surveycited by 163
  2. 2015Salient Object Detection: A Benchmarkcited by 130
  3. 2014Salient Object Detection: A Surveycited by 98
  4. 2018Deep Learning using Rectified Linear Units (ReLU)cited by 43
  5. 2020The Three Ghosts of Medical AI: Can the Black-Box Present Deliver?cited by 16
  6. 2016End-to-End Subtitle Detection and Recognition for Videos in East Asian Languages via CNN Ensemble with Near-Human-Level Performancecited by 4
  7. 2018Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Microcirculation Images from Septic and Non-Septic Patientscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.

2 papers.