Explainable artificial intelligence for mechanics: physics-informing neural networks for constitutive models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
(Artificial) neural networks have become increasingly popular in mechanics to accelerate computations with model order reduction techniques and as universal models for a wide variety of materials. However, the major disadvantage of neural networks remains: their numerous parameters are challenging to interpret and explain. Thus, neural networks are often labeled as black boxes, and their results often elude human interpretation. In mechanics, the new and active field of physics-informed neural networks attempts to mitigate this disadvantage by designing deep neural networks on the basis of mechanical knowledge. By using this a priori knowledge, deeper and more complex neural networks became feasible, since the mechanical assumptions could be explained. However, the internal reasoning and explanation of neural network parameters remain mysterious. Complementary to the physics-informed approach, we propose a first step towards a physics-informing approach, which explains neural networks trained on mechanical data a posteriori. This novel explainable artificial intelligence approach aims at elucidating the black box of neural networks and their high-dimensional representations. Therein, the principal component analysis decorrelates the distributed representations in cell states of RNNs and allows the comparison to known and fundamental functions. The novel approach is supported by a systematic hyperparameter search strategy that identifies the best neural network architectures and training parameters. The findings of three case studies on fundamental constitutive models (hyperelasticity, elastoplasticity, and viscoelasticity) imply that the proposed strategy can help identify numerical and analytical closed-form solutions to characterize new materials.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2021.
Builds on
14 of 72 references.
References · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
- 2016Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 688
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
- 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 342
- 2015LSTM: A Search Space Odysseycited by 315
- 2015Non-stochastic Best Arm Identification and Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 219
- 2018Adversarial Uncertainty Quantification in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 120
- 2017Explaining Recurrent Neural Network Predictions in Sentiment Analysiscited by 87
- 2018iNNvestigate neural networks!cited by 58
- 2020Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive lawscited by 51
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.