mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Decrypting Cryptic Crosswords: Semantically Complex Wordplay Puzzles as a Target for NLP

arXiv 2104.08620 ↗First posted 17 Apr 2021cs.CL cs.AIcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cryptic crosswords, the dominant crossword variety in the UK, are a promising target for advancing NLP systems that seek to process semantically complex, highly compositional language. Cryptic clues read like fluent natural language but are adversarially composed of two parts: a definition and a wordplay cipher requiring character-level manipulations. Expert humans use creative intelligence to solve cryptics, flexibly combining linguistic, world, and domain knowledge. In this paper, we make two main contributions. First, we present a dataset of cryptic clues as a challenging new benchmark for NLP systems that seek to process compositional language in more creative, human-like ways. After showing that three non-neural approaches and T5, a state-of-the-art neural language model, do not achieve good performance, we make our second main contribution: a novel curriculum approach, in which the model is first fine-tuned on related tasks such as unscrambling words.We also introduce a challenging data split, examine the meta-linguistic capabilities of subword-tokenized models, and investigate model systematicity by perturbing the wordplay part of clues, showing that T5 exhibits behavior partially consistent with human solving strategies. Although our curricular approach considerably improves on the T5 baseline, our best-performing model still fails to generalize to the extent that humans can. Thus, cryptic crosswords remain an unsolved challenge for NLP systems and a potential source of future innovation.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2021.

Builds on

18 of 43 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,973
  6. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 896
  7. 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
  8. 2020Experience Grounds Languagecited by 241
  9. 2020The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligencecited by 194
  10. 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192
  11. 2020Injecting Numerical Reasoning Skills into Language Modelscited by 133
  12. 2019QuaRTz: An Open-Domain Dataset of Qualitative Relationship Questionscited by 89
6 more
  1. 2021LIME: Learning Inductive Bias for Primitives of Mathematical Reasoningcited by 46
  2. 2019Pun Generation with Surprisecited by 37
  3. 2018Automatically Composing Representation Transformations as a Means for Generalizationcited by 35
  4. 2019Pun-GAN: Generative Adversarial Network for Pun Generationcited by 18
  5. 2021Cryptonite: A Cryptic Crossword Benchmark for Extreme Ambiguity in Languagecited by 15
  6. 2014Dr.Fill: Crosswords and an Implemented Solver for Singly Weighted CSPscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 7; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: