mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural String Edit Distance

arXiv 2104.08388 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2021cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose the neural string edit distance model for string-pair matching and string transduction based on learnable string edit distance. We modify the original expectation-maximization learned edit distance algorithm into a differentiable loss function, allowing us to integrate it into a neural network providing a contextual representation of the input. We evaluate on cognate detection, transliteration, and grapheme-to-phoneme conversion, and show that we can trade off between performance and interpretability in a single framework. Using contextual representations, which are difficult to interpret, we match the performance of state-of-the-art string-pair matching models. Using static embeddings and a slightly different loss function, we force interpretability, at the expense of an accuracy drop.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2021.

Builds on

28 of 55 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  5. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  6. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  7. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  8. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
  9. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
  10. 2016Language Modeling with Gated Convolutional Networkscited by 702
  11. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
  12. 2016Neural Architectures for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 550
16 more
  1. 2014Recurrent Models of Visual Attentioncited by 349
  2. 2017Soft-DTW: a Differentiable Loss Function for Time-Seriescited by 271
  3. 2019Levenshtein Transformercited by 199
  4. 2018The Best of Both Worlds: Combining Recent Advances in Neural Machine Translationcited by 102
  5. 2019Encode, Tag, Realize: High-Precision Text Editingcited by 99
  6. 2020Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation with Latent Alignmentscited by 96
  7. 2018End-to-End Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Connectionist Temporal Classificationcited by 72
  8. 2019EditNTS: An Neural Programmer-Interpreter Model for Sentence Simplification through Explicit Editingcited by 63
  9. 2020Transformer based Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversioncited by 32
  10. 2015Sequence-to-Sequence Neural Net Models for Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversioncited by 19
  11. 2017Massively Multilingual Neural Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversioncited by 15
  12. 2018Are Automatic Methods for Cognate Detection Good Enough for Phylogenetic Reconstruction in Historical Linguistics?cited by 15
  13. 2016Online Segment to Segment Neural Transductioncited by 14
  14. 2016Sequence-to-sequence neural network models for transliterationcited by 7
  15. 2019Optimal Transport-based Alignment of Learned Character Representations for String Similaritycited by 7
  16. 2020Unsupervised Bilingual Lexicon Induction Across Writing Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.