mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning to Reason for Text Generation from Scientific Tables

arXiv 2104.08296 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2021cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we introduce SciGen, a new challenge dataset for the task of reasoning-aware data-to-text generation consisting of tables from scientific articles and their corresponding descriptions. Describing scientific tables goes beyond the surface realization of the table content and requires reasoning over table values. The unique properties of SciGen are that (1) tables mostly contain numerical values, and (2) the corresponding descriptions require arithmetic reasoning. SciGen is therefore the first dataset that assesses the arithmetic reasoning capabilities of generation models on complex input structures, i.e., tables from scientific articles. We study the effectiveness of state-of-the-art data-to-text generation models on SciGen and evaluate the results using common metrics as well as human evaluation. Our results and analyses show that (a) while humans like to reason for describing scientific tables, the ability of state-of-the-art models is severely limited on this task, (b) while adding more training data improves the results, it is not the solution for reasoning-aware text generation, and (c) one of the main bottlenecks for this task is the lack of proper automatic evaluation metrics. The data, code, and annotations for human evaluation will be available at https://github.com/UKPLab/SciGen. SciGen opens new avenues for future research in reasoning-aware text generation and evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2021.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2019HuggingFace's Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processingcited by 2,201
  5. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  6. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  7. 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 425
  8. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 415
  9. 2020ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Datasetcited by 267
  10. 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226
  11. 2017Survey of the State of the Art in Natural Language Generation: Core tasks, applications and evaluationcited by 206
  12. 2020DART: Open-Domain Structured Data Record to Text Generationcited by 144
12 more
  1. 2019Text Generation from Knowledge Graphs with Graph Transformerscited by 122
  2. 2020Investigating Pretrained Language Models for Graph-to-Text Generationcited by 117
  3. 2020Logical Natural Language Generation from Open-Domain Tablescited by 90
  4. 2019Evaluating the State-of-the-Art of End-to-End Natural Language Generation: The E2E NLG Challengecited by 86
  5. 2020AxCell: Automatic Extraction of Results from Machine Learning Paperscited by 48
  6. 2019Constrained Decoding for Neural NLG from Compositional Representations in Task-Oriented Dialoguecited by 35
  7. 2018Findings of the E2E NLG Challengecited by 28
  8. 2018Describing a Knowledge Basecited by 18
  9. 2018Controlling Personality-Based Stylistic Variation with Neural Natural Language Generatorscited by 14
  10. 2018Generating Descriptions from Structured Data Using a Bifocal Attention Mechanism and Gated Orthogonalizationcited by 12
  11. 2018Can Neural Generators for Dialogue Learn Sentence Planning and Discourse Structuring?cited by 12
  12. 2019Improving Generalization by Incorporating Coverage in Natural Language Inferencecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: