Designing a Minimal Retrieve-and-Read System for Open-Domain Question Answering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In open-domain question answering (QA), retrieve-and-read mechanism has the inherent benefit of interpretability and the easiness of adding, removing, or editing knowledge compared to the parametric approaches of closed-book QA models. However, it is also known to suffer from its large storage footprint due to its document corpus and index. Here, we discuss several orthogonal strategies to drastically reduce the footprint of a retrieve-and-read open-domain QA system by up to 160x. Our results indicate that retrieve-and-read can be a viable option even in a highly constrained serving environment such as edge devices, as we show that it can achieve better accuracy than a purely parametric model with comparable docker-level system size.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2021.
Builds on
22 of 28 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
- 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
10 more
- 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
- 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
- 2019Q8BERT: Quantized 8Bit BERTcited by 296
- 2021PAQ: 65 Million Probably-Asked Questions and What You Can Do With Themcited by 198
- 2018NSML: Meet the MLaaS platform with a real-world case studycited by 70
- 2021NeurIPS 2020 EfficientQA Competition: Systems, Analyses and Lessons Learnedcited by 52
- 2017NSML: A Machine Learning Platform That Enables You to Focus on Your Modelscited by 34
- 2020A Memory Efficient Baseline for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 32
- 2020Is Retriever Merely an Approximator of Reader?cited by 30
- 2021Pruning the Index Contents for Memory Efficient Open-Domain QAcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022A Survey for Efficient Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 20
- 2021Boosted Dense Retrievercited by 10
- 2022Bridging the Training-Inference Gap for Dense Phrase Retrievalcited by 1
- 2025PCA-RAG: Principal Component Analysis for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 1
- 2024Building Efficient and Effective OpenQA Systems for Low-Resource Languagescited by 0
- 2025PCA-RAG: Principal Component Analysis for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation11 Apr 2025
- 2024Building Efficient and Effective OpenQA Systems for Low-Resource Languages7 Jan 2024
- 2022A Survey for Efficient Open Domain Question Answering15 Nov 2022
- 2022Bridging the Training-Inference Gap for Dense Phrase Retrieval25 Oct 2022
- 2021Boosted Dense Retriever14 Dec 2021