On the Impact of Knowledge-based Linguistic Annotations in the Quality of Scientific Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In essence, embedding algorithms work by optimizing the distance between a word and its usual context in order to generate an embedding space that encodes the distributional representation of words. In addition to single words or word pieces, other features which result from the linguistic analysis of text, including lexical, grammatical and semantic information, can be used to improve the quality of embedding spaces. However, until now we did not have a precise understanding of the impact that such individual annotations and their possible combinations may have in the quality of the embeddings. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive study on the use of explicit linguistic annotations to generate embeddings from a scientific corpus and quantify their impact in the resulting representations. Our results show how the effect of such annotations in the embeddings varies depending on the evaluation task. In general, we observe that learning embeddings using linguistic annotations contributes to achieve better evaluation results.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2021.
Builds on
19 of 53 references.
References · 19
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
- 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
7 more
- 2015Holographic Embeddings of Knowledge Graphscited by 181
- 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
- 2018Construction of the Literature Graph in Semantic Scholarcited by 118
- 2017BPEmb: Tokenization-free Pre-trained Subword Embeddings in 275 Languagescited by 52
- 2016SimVerb-3500: A Large-Scale Evaluation Set of Verb Similaritycited by 44
- 2016Embedding Words and Senses Together via Joint Knowledge-Enhanced Trainingcited by 9
- 2016Swivel: Improving Embeddings by Noticing What's Missingcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.