Conclusive Local Interpretation Rules for Random Forests
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In critical situations involving discrimination, gender inequality, economic damage, and even the possibility of casualties, machine learning models must be able to provide clear interpretations for their decisions. Otherwise, their obscure decision-making processes can lead to socioethical issues as they interfere with people's lives. In the aforementioned sectors, random forest algorithms strive, thus their ability to explain themselves is an obvious requirement. In this paper, we present LionForests, which relies on a preliminary work of ours. LionForests is a random forest-specific interpretation technique, which provides rules as explanations. It is applicable from binary classification tasks to multi-class classification and regression tasks, and it is supported by a stable theoretical background. Experimentation, including sensitivity analysis and comparison with state-of-the-art techniques, is also performed to demonstrate the efficacy of our contribution. Finally, we highlight a unique property of LionForests, called conclusiveness, that provides interpretation validity and distinguishes it from previous techniques.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2021.
Builds on
10 of 66 references.
References · 10
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2018Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 165
- 2021Benchmarking and Survey of Explanation Methods for Black Box Modelscited by 136
- 2014Interpreting Tree Ensembles with inTreescited by 37
- 2016Making Tree Ensembles Interpretable: A Bayesian Model Selection Approachcited by 27
- 2016Interpreting Models via Single Tree Approximationcited by 17
- 2019LionForests: Local Interpretation of Random Forestscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 4.
9 papers.
- 2024Explainable Predictive Maintenance: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 10
- 2022Local Multi-Label Explanations for Random Forestcited by 3
- 2024A survey and taxonomy of methods interpreting random forest modelscited by 2
- 2024Developing Guidelines for Functionally-Grounded Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence using Tabular Datacited by 2
- 2022BELLATREX: Building Explanations through a LocaLly AccuraTe Rule EXtractorcited by 1
- 2022Truthful Meta-Explanations for Local Interpretability of Machine Learning Modelscited by 1
- 2024Forest-ORE: Mining Optimal Rule Ensemble to interpret Random Forest modelscited by 1
- 2023Personalized Interpretable Classificationcited by 0
- 2023Local Interpretability of Random Forests for Multi-Target Regressioncited by 0
- 2024Developing Guidelines for Functionally-Grounded Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence using Tabular Data30 Sep 2024
- 2024A survey and taxonomy of methods interpreting random forest models17 Jul 2024
- 2024Forest-ORE: Mining Optimal Rule Ensemble to interpret Random Forest models26 Mar 2024
- 2024Explainable Predictive Maintenance: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges and Opportunities15 Jan 2024
- 2023Local Interpretability of Random Forests for Multi-Target Regression29 Mar 2023
- 2023Personalized Interpretable Classification6 Feb 2023
- 2022Truthful Meta-Explanations for Local Interpretability of Machine Learning Models7 Dec 2022
- 2022Local Multi-Label Explanations for Random Forest5 Jul 2022
- 2022BELLATREX: Building Explanations through a LocaLly AccuraTe Rule EXtractor29 Mar 2022