LionForests: Local Interpretation of Random Forests
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Towards a future where machine learning systems will integrate into every aspect of people's lives, researching methods to interpret such systems is necessary, instead of focusing exclusively on enhancing their performance. Enriching the trust between these systems and people will accelerate this integration process. Many medical and retail banking/finance applications use state-of-the-art machine learning techniques to predict certain aspects of new instances. Tree ensembles, like random forests, are widely acceptable solutions on these tasks, while at the same time they are avoided due to their black-box uninterpretable nature, creating an unreasonable paradox. In this paper, we provide a methodology for shedding light on the predictions of the misjudged family of tree ensemble algorithms. Using classic unsupervised learning techniques and an enhanced similarity metric, to wander among transparent trees inside a forest following breadcrumbs, the interpretable essence of tree ensembles arises. An interpretation provided by these systems using our approach, which we call "LionForests", can be a simple, comprehensive rule.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.
2 papers.
- 2021On Explaining Random Forests with SATcited by 57
- 2021Conclusive Local Interpretation Rules for Random Forestscited by 9
- 2021On Explaining Random Forests with SAT21 May 2021
- 2021Conclusive Local Interpretation Rules for Random Forests13 Apr 2021